From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf separately
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:16:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c08bd61-688f-e95b-5fa3-584f190ed4bf@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d66e78e3-2000-611b-cd74-8a61461153e8@canonical.com>
On 3/11/21 11:57 AM, Colin Ian King wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Static analysis on linux-next with Coverity has found a potential issue
> in drivers/pinctrl/core.c with the following commit:
>
> commit 0952b7ec1614abf232e921aac0cc2bca8e60e162
> Author: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
> Date: Wed Mar 10 09:16:54 2021 +0100
>
> pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf separately
>
> The analysis is as follows:
>
> 1234 /**
> 1235 * pinctrl_commit_state() - select/activate/program a pinctrl state
> to HW
> 1236 * @p: the pinctrl handle for the device that requests configuration
> 1237 * @state: the state handle to select/activate/program
> 1238 */
> 1239 static int pinctrl_commit_state(struct pinctrl *p, struct
> pinctrl_state *state)
> 1240 {
> 1241 struct pinctrl_setting *setting, *setting2;
> 1242 struct pinctrl_state *old_state = p->state;
>
> 1. var_decl: Declaring variable ret without initializer.
>
> 1243 int ret;
> 1244
>
> 2. Condition p->state, taking true branch.
>
> 1245 if (p->state) {
> 1246 /*
> 1247 * For each pinmux setting in the old state, forget
> SW's record
> 1248 * of mux owner for that pingroup. Any pingroups
> which are
> 1249 * still owned by the new state will be re-acquired
> by the call
> 1250 * to pinmux_enable_setting() in the loop below.
> 1251 */
>
> 3. Condition 0 /* !!(!__builtin_types_compatible_p() &&
> !__builtin_types_compatible_p()) */, taking false branch.
> 4. Condition !(&setting->node == &p->state->settings), taking true
> branch.
> 7. Condition 0 /* !!(!__builtin_types_compatible_p() &&
> !__builtin_types_compatible_p()) */, taking false branch.
> 8. Condition !(&setting->node == &p->state->settings), taking true
> branch.
> 11. Condition 0 /* !!(!__builtin_types_compatible_p() &&
> !__builtin_types_compatible_p()) */, taking false branch.
> 12. Condition !(&setting->node == &p->state->settings), taking false
> branch.
>
> 1252 list_for_each_entry(setting, &p->state->settings,
> node) {
>
> 5. Condition setting->type != PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, taking true
> branch.
> 9. Condition setting->type != PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, taking true
> branch.
> 1253 if (setting->type != PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP)
> 6. Continuing loop.
> 10. Continuing loop.
>
> 1254 continue;
> 1255 pinmux_disable_setting(setting);
> 1256 }
> 1257 }
> 1258
> 1259 p->state = NULL;
> 1260
> 1261 /* Apply all the settings for the new state - pinmux first */
>
> 13. Condition 0 /* !!(!__builtin_types_compatible_p() &&
> !__builtin_types_compatible_p()) */, taking false branch.
> 14. Condition !(&setting->node == &state->settings), taking true branch.
> 1262 list_for_each_entry(setting, &state->settings, node) {
> 15. Switch case value PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN.
>
> 1263 switch (setting->type) {
> 1264 case PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP:
> 1265 ret = pinmux_enable_setting(setting);
> 1266 break;
> 1267 case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN:
> 1268 case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP:
>
> 16. Breaking from switch.
>
> 1269 break;
> 1270 default:
> 1271 ret = -EINVAL;
> 1272 break;
> 1273 }
> 1274
>
> Uninitialized scalar variable (UNINIT)
> 17. uninit_use: Using uninitialized value ret.
>
> 1275 if (ret < 0)
> 1276 goto unapply_new_state;
>
> For the PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN and PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP
> setting->type cases the loop can break out with ret not being set. Since
> ret has not been initialized it the ret < 0 check is checking against an
> uninitialized value.
>
> I was not sure if the PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN and
> PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP cases should be setting ret and if so, what
> the value of ret should be set to (is it an error condition or not?). Or
> should ret be initialized to 0 or a default error value at the start of
> the function.
>
> Hence I'm reporting this issue.
What about this? Is this passing static analysis?
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
index f5c32d2a3c91..136c323d855e 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
@@ -1266,6 +1266,7 @@ static int pinctrl_commit_state(struct pinctrl *p,
struct pinctrl_state *state)
break;
case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN:
case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP:
+ ret = 0;
break;
default:
ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -1284,6 +1285,7 @@ static int pinctrl_commit_state(struct pinctrl *p,
struct pinctrl_state *state)
list_for_each_entry(setting, &state->settings, node) {
switch (setting->type) {
case PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP:
+ ret = 0;
break;
case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN:
case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP:
Thanks,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-11 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-11 10:57 pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf separately Colin Ian King
2021-03-11 11:16 ` Michal Simek [this message]
2021-03-11 11:24 ` Colin Ian King
2021-03-11 11:28 ` Michal Simek
2021-03-11 14:03 ` Colin Ian King
2021-03-11 14:39 ` Linus Walleij
2021-03-12 12:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-12 12:49 ` Colin Ian King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c08bd61-688f-e95b-5fa3-584f190ed4bf@xilinx.com \
--to=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox