From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EB471E2317; Mon, 6 Jan 2025 23:49:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736207358; cv=none; b=PfAT5EC7qV0yPG5tPOJK43NLEfHFalnsTNmoX3MaZTkTl3VL4GKKkALnOzpjBuvnCy+NrwPTiQ95vP6ZcRm0WuDG8xKROgmW5O4vioLrRZDwD4qwiXU+ewu4GNdmRcKpb5mZA5uC9KcZzIxY+TKCgtT4hWCQWYFz5i02ZGEIkuk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736207358; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AKDblFyGSXFHnQiBgrRD0Gxn72X5JIg7RBip/sLYtvk=; h=Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:From:Cc:To:Date; b=UV1nsZHMgnbHz3NisOIsXIu5jRcYarAUXYKAkQHFjptONnAVOshAx6aTQcAp1KSzObAn8TMffy69FvD9Hy7beZ1gTnu2uLz7J65MQ7s0atWHbZSRVqI17L/iTJKgrOCNX7NbqWt//YkZvpaJux72MBK5wjZ2C/vxYI7ACaa7p68= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=K1f3sK5n; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="K1f3sK5n" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8CECC4CED2; Mon, 6 Jan 2025 23:49:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1736207358; bh=AKDblFyGSXFHnQiBgrRD0Gxn72X5JIg7RBip/sLYtvk=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=K1f3sK5nKW1Evn2VbiakpExEBZdVGYklt02ihKSbRUOYdxm6K+yCTotn3WVum1xfN Z+VVE4nQjD/H1BPkZ8uvq0IZ9uz1tTHhiKkQRaJ9Qg7jzbubeItrY2pEN+LtJzIFEM rl24Ec9F0pYpU+v+nlFXchIGlyNuOg4mxaoGdJNDOgJIfVgNcTNST48TmCAkj1zxj/ 6qP/WrbdViepMm1TNG4Cm3vCy/37B8uahTUX9TcHEU0xHnrz3gUdgaD+Jo7BXkRClH Ou3e0s7cMM3MEgqRbLwDZmTROfycfVI3H9g6G4twXN8kIU6eLw81RIOYfmQ8zf/1lj a+/A8n5s+5WUg== Message-ID: <5cfc565e175bdc5b37dc875bf8ee3076.sboyd@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc() From: Stephen Boyd Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com To: Ethan Carter Edwards , kristo@kernel.org Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 15:49:15 -0800 User-Agent: alot/0.12.dev1+gaa8c22fdeedb Quoting Ethan Carter Edwards (2024-12-29 21:28:58) > Use 2-factor multiplication argument form kcalloc() instead > of kzalloc(). >=20 > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 >=20 > Signed-off-by: Ethan Carter Edwards > --- Applied to clk-next