From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261810AbUKBOwi (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:52:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261847AbUKBOrr (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:47:47 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.194]:51371 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261918AbUKBOgz (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:36:55 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=TmIlMlxFVA9gJDDN5J+eNNovU06ahl+olAF5dV8T0Cgy9nLcZ2YJckEMTm5llBLsvMerutujmfryjHjEcny+CTAJsVQjJqzcTZ+Cv8V+Co/Tx83N1W/nis5hcvq1GZThBgwWcYVBv3eEZglmUoa7vIwtEpVOY87ofZ4KpK+sfF4= Message-ID: <5d1794bb041102063625a52d93@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:36:54 +0300 From: Vasya Pupkin Reply-To: Vasya Pupkin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] comment typo In-Reply-To: <5d1794bb04103011465b4efd52@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <5d1794bb04103011465b4efd52@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey, guys, Im doing something wrong or it's not typo in comments? On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 22:46:08 +0400, Vasya Pupkin wrote: > Signed-off-by: Vasia Pupkin > > --- linux-2.6.9/kernel/timer.c.orig 2004-10-30 22:41:14.000000000 +0400 > +++ linux-2.6.9/kernel/timer.c 2004-10-30 22:41:52.000000000 +0400 > @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ > /* > * The current time > * wall_to_monotonic is what we need to add to xtime (or xtime corrected > - * for sub jiffie times) to get to monotonic time. Monotonic is pegged at zero > + * for sub jiffie times) to get to monotonic time. Monotonic is pegged > * at zero at system boot time, so wall_to_monotonic will be negative, > * however, we will ALWAYS keep the tv_nsec part positive so we can use > * the usual normalization. >