From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] coccinelle: Add script to check for platform_get_irq() excessive prints
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:21:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d38a1c3.1c69fb81.2b26a.b585@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c98b8f50-1adf-ea95-a91c-ec451e9fefe2@web.de>
Quoting Markus Elfring (2019-07-24 02:30:16)
> I would prefer to concentrate the usage of SmPL disjunctions on changing
> implementation details so that the specification of duplicate code
> can be avoided.
>
>
> > +(
> > +platform_get_irq(E, ...)
> > +|
> > +platform_get_irq_byname(E, ...)
> > +);
>
> Function names:
>
> +(platform_get_irq
> +|platform_get_irq_byname
> +)(E, ...);
>
>
> > +if ( \( ret < 0 \| ret <= 0 \) )
>
> Comparison operators:
>
> +if (ret \( < \| <= \) 0)
>
Thanks. Will fold the above two in.
>
> > +if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>
> Is it appropriate to treat this error code check as optional
> by the shown transformation approach?
> Can this case distinction be omitted?
I don't know what you mean here. Do you want me to drop this part so
that EPROBE_DEFER checks don't get removed?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-24 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-23 18:16 [PATCH v4 0/3] Add error message to platform_get_irq*() Stephen Boyd
2019-07-23 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] driver core: platform: Add an " Stephen Boyd
2019-07-24 15:00 ` Markus Elfring
2019-07-24 18:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-25 5:55 ` Markus Elfring
2019-07-23 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] treewide: Remove dev_err() usage after platform_get_irq() Stephen Boyd
2019-07-23 18:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-07-23 22:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-24 11:17 ` [v4 " Markus Elfring
2019-07-23 19:30 ` [PATCH v4 " Rob Herring
2019-07-23 22:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-24 17:08 ` Mark Brown
2019-07-24 6:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-07-24 17:06 ` Mark Brown
2019-07-23 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] coccinelle: Add script to check for platform_get_irq() excessive prints Stephen Boyd
2019-07-24 9:30 ` Markus Elfring
2019-07-24 18:21 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2019-07-24 18:38 ` [v4 " Markus Elfring
2019-07-24 13:18 ` [PATCH v4 " Markus Elfring
2019-07-24 18:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-24 18:45 ` [v4 " Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d38a1c3.1c69fb81.2b26a.b585@mx.google.com \
--to=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox