From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26E0C41514 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A264E23402 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="dYfsQD/b" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730903AbfHUVod (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:44:33 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:41857 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727923AbfHUVod (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:44:33 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id x15so2110329pgg.8 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:44:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :references:cc:subject:to:from:user-agent:date; bh=UtdjlTTwPPpAjm4AUF1n+63QfaoAivza/ox3sRCZdnA=; b=dYfsQD/boswD54RLhQ9rPhB5Jy6CC9kMzU4yhUW97mYq6mK7qizOAnVuaB3skD+o8f gkaB1+cIQZk3UAAjHaJJBTLB2QcsIXcrXyWK5vOyZLE8iEwS0kpOUsZHdtvFPa2AqhKe HzcptyRqxA+zceEHHD9F0tbUbW9qA5dOM8NKM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:subject:to:from :user-agent:date; bh=UtdjlTTwPPpAjm4AUF1n+63QfaoAivza/ox3sRCZdnA=; b=Pprmm+aXRR0tzzwVTMP6tpWPymIB2CsCa2Dbz4TfmC6yEoEVGqBnIqcAmGPJaB2v+o svQYqNC2kGCYOxlRONYgbgcirjs1UNF0tfrhZuJgZKiGGVgkTlvGf7jI32jrz9KHSPaw LjOHLN+HYZtFAI+SPG5NgXMXkIwiMQz6drBcg3xIWyBnzLUw5/3g+sYbwAMYgZcr7lAc YFwcl2lU7f+WCDw0YatHOfygR3lvW4FTYZUzEpGCFxN5eQw2FW0D42+HLDZVPpTQfp3u NoAnzQCnYz2ZVjOnzj11aqhBOZp/yUZIzcK7Ilg//7tr9Brq1ms++ux+KDnE3s0PNZ3Q Y/fg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUKGACvABUAW069MdtnCTuYtV1a60EI3RO7LDNPlSELWwkwY2/1 IuhBiKbbp/2iydvZHay0bUa6ng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy45+Mu6qMPOpu87JONLRNOdIWhh0t+/JhxZBGNWIjM32cz2JoD0Y2H8PFtoZy+NtXUCTBprw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bc4b:: with SMTP id t11mr2104340pjv.87.1566423872553; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chromium.org ([2620:15c:202:1:fa53:7765:582b:82b9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e26sm27118599pfd.14.2019.08.21.14.44.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5d5dbb3f.1c69fb81.eaa49.52b0@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20190821191131.y7cmdtkxfs3ojmv6@linux.intel.com> References: <20190812223622.73297-1-swboyd@chromium.org> <20190812223622.73297-4-swboyd@chromium.org> <20190819163505.wnyhgrtg4akiifdn@linux.intel.com> <5d5ad75e.1c69fb81.43fc3.5a77@mx.google.com> <20190821191131.y7cmdtkxfs3ojmv6@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Huewe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Andrey Pronin , Duncan Laurie , Jason Gunthorpe , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Guenter Roeck , Alexander Steffen Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] tpm: tpm_tis_spi: Add a pre-transfer callback To: Jarkko Sakkinen From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:44:31 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Jarkko Sakkinen (2019-08-21 12:11:31) > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:07:41AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Any name is fine for me. Any suggestions? >=20 > What if just add @ready to struct tpm_tis_spi_phy add drop this patch > altogether? >=20 > It is only used only by CR50 but I think it is less of an overkill than > adding a callback. >=20 Ok, sounds good.