public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/24] selftests/resctrl: Create cache_alloc_size() helper
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:28:40 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5db5680-4123-17b8-e657-39ba20356259@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <287e5f1f-87d5-473a-2bff-271adca8d458@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7181 bytes --]

On Fri, 21 Apr 2023, Reinette Chatre wrote:

> On 4/18/2023 4:44 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > CAT and CMT tests calculate the span size from the n-bits cache
> > allocation on their own.
> > 
> > Add cache_alloc_size() helper which calculates size of the cache
> > allocation for the given number of bits to avoid duplicating code.
> 
> This patch is very heavy on the usage of allocation when I think it
> only refers to the cache size ... how that size is used by the caller
> is independent from this. 
> 
> Compare to how it sounds with some small changes to changelog:
> 
> 	CAT and CMT tests calculate the span size from the capacity
> 	bitmask independently.
> 	
> 	Add cache_size() helper which calculates the size of the
> 	cache for the given number of bits to avoid duplicating code.
> 
> I think removing "alloc" helps to convey what this code actually does.

Does it? Without something to indicate its not the full cache size, 
there's possiblity for confusion. While the tests are mostly interested 
in the allocated size, the full cache size is also collected (solely for 
printing it out, IIRC). Maybe I should rename those variable to 
total_cache_size or something like that to mitigate the confusion?

> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c    | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c |  8 +++++--
> >  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c |  4 +++-
> >  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h  |  2 ++
> >  4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c
> > index 6bc912de38be..b983af394e33 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,33 @@ static struct read_format rf_cqm;
> >  static int fd_lm;
> >  char llc_occup_path[1024];
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * cache_alloc_size - Calculate alloc size for given cache alloc mask
> 
> "cache_size - Calculate number of bytes represented by bitmask" ?
> Please feel free to improve.
> 
> 
> > + * @cpu_no:		CPU number
> > + * @cache_type:		Cache level L2/L3
> > + * @alloc_mask:		Cache alloc mask
> 
> The description is mostly a rewrite of the variable name. Can it be
> more descriptive?
> 
> > + * @alloc_size:		Alloc size returned on success
> 
> I do not think the utility should assume anything about how
> the value it provides should be used. Instead it should just reflect
> what the value is.

I was just referring to that the value is filled only on success.

> > + * Returns: 0 on success with @alloc_size filled, non-zero on error.
> > + */
> > +int cache_alloc_size(int cpu_no, char *cache_type, unsigned long alloc_mask,
> > +		     unsigned long *alloc_size)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long cache_size, full_mask;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = get_cbm_mask(cache_type, &full_mask);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = get_cache_size(cpu_no, cache_type, &cache_size);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	*alloc_size = cache_size * count_bits(alloc_mask) / count_bits(full_mask);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void initialize_perf_event_attr(void)
> >  {
> >  	pea_llc_miss.type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> > index 9bf5d05d9e74..d3fbd4de9f8a 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c
> > @@ -140,7 +140,9 @@ int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int n, char *cache_type)
> >  	/* Set param values for parent thread which will be allocated bitmask
> >  	 * with (max_bits - n) bits
> >  	 */
> > -	param.span = cache_size * (count_of_bits - n) / count_of_bits;
> > +	ret = cache_alloc_size(cpu_no, cache_type, l_mask, &param.span);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> >  	strcpy(param.ctrlgrp, "c2");
> >  	strcpy(param.mongrp, "m2");
> >  	strcpy(param.filename, RESULT_FILE_NAME2);
> > @@ -162,7 +164,9 @@ int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int n, char *cache_type)
> >  		param.mask = l_mask_1;
> >  		strcpy(param.ctrlgrp, "c1");
> >  		strcpy(param.mongrp, "m1");
> > -		param.span = cache_size * n / count_of_bits;
> > +		ret = cache_alloc_size(cpu_no, cache_type, l_mask_1, &param.span);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			exit(-1);
> >  		strcpy(param.filename, RESULT_FILE_NAME1);
> >  		param.num_of_runs = 0;
> >  		param.cpu_no = sibling_cpu_no;
> 
> Did this change intend to remove the duplicate code mentioned
> in the changelog?

It removes n CBM bits -> cache size calculations by collecting the 
calculation into one place.

cache_alloc_size() takes mask instead of n (CBM bits) as input which makes 
things easier down the line when the new CAT test starts to tweak the 
alloc size. The new CAT test would otherwise need to track both the mask 
and n.

cache_alloc_size() is independent of what caller requires so the full mask 
is not passed from the caller.

> I was expecting the calls to get_cbm_mask() and get_cache_size() within 
> cat_perf_miss_val() to be removed.

I would have wanted to remove get_cache_size() but it would mean removing 
cache size print or moving it to elsewhere.

get_cbm_mask() cannot be removed as it's used by the test to calculate the 
mask the test wants (but it no longer has to determine the size itself but 
uses this new helper instead).

I can try to amend the changelog to explain things better.

> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> > index ae54bbabbd91..efe77e0f1d4c 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> > @@ -105,10 +105,12 @@ int cmt_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
> >  		.cpu_no		= cpu_no,
> >  		.filename	= RESULT_FILE_NAME,
> >  		.mask		= ~(long_mask << n) & long_mask,
> > -		.span		= cache_size * n / count_of_bits,
> >  		.num_of_runs	= 0,
> >  		.setup		= cmt_setup,
> >  	};
> > +	ret = cache_alloc_size(cpu_no, "L3", param.mask, &param.span);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> >  
> >  	if (strcmp(benchmark_cmd[0], "fill_buf") == 0)
> >  		sprintf(benchmark_cmd[1], "%lu", param.span);
> 
> Same here regarding removal of code.
> 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> > index bcc95faa5b4e..65425d92684e 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> > @@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ int mba_schemata_change(int cpu_no, char *bw_report, char **benchmark_cmd);
> >  void mba_test_cleanup(void);
> >  int get_cbm_mask(char *cache_type, unsigned long *mask);
> >  int get_cache_size(int cpu_no, char *cache_type, unsigned long *cache_size);
> > +int cache_alloc_size(int cpu_no, char *cache_type, unsigned long alloc_mask,
> > +		     unsigned long *alloc_size);
> >  void ctrlc_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *ptr);
> >  int signal_handler_register(void);
> >  void signal_handler_unregister(void);
> 
> 
> Reinette
> 

-- 
 i.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-24 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-18 11:44 [PATCH v2 00/24] selftests/resctrl: Fixes, cleanups, and rewritten CAT test Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] selftests/resctrl: Add resctrl.h into build deps Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:07   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] selftests/resctrl: Check also too low values for CBM bits Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:08   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-24 10:46     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] selftests/resctrl: Move resctrl FS mount/umount to higher level Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:09   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-24 14:58     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] selftests/resctrl: Remove mum_resctrlfs Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:11   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-24 14:55     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] selftests/resctrl: Make span unsigned long everywhere Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:12   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-24 15:05     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] selftests/resctrl: Express span in bytes Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:12   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-24 15:31     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] selftests/resctrl: Remove duplicated preparation for span arg Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:14   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-24 15:41     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] selftests/resctrl: Don't use variable argument list for ->setup() Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] selftests/resctrl: Remove "malloc_and_init_memory" param from run_fill_buf() Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] selftests/resctrl: Split run_fill_buf() to alloc, work, and dealloc helpers Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:16   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-24 16:01     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-24 16:32       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] selftests/resctrl: Remove start_buf local variable from buffer alloc func Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:16   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] selftests/resctrl: Don't pass test name to fill_buf Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] selftests/resctrl: Add flush_buffer() " Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:16   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] selftests/resctrl: Remove test type checks from cat_val() Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] selftests/resctrl: Refactor get_cbm_mask() Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:17   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-31  6:03   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-05-31  9:24     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] selftests/resctrl: Create cache_alloc_size() helper Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-24 16:28     ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2023-04-24 16:45       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-18 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] selftests/resctrl: Replace count_bits with count_consecutive_bits() Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:20   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-25 11:41     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-25 14:28       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-05-31  7:25   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-05-31  9:35     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-06-01  6:20       ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-04-18 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] selftests/resctrl: Exclude shareable bits from schemata in CAT test Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] selftests/resctrl: Pass the real number of tests to show_cache_info() Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:20   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-18 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] selftests/resctrl: Move CAT/CMT test global vars to func they are used Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:20   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-18 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] selftests/resctrl: Read in less obvious order to defeat prefetch optimizations Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-31  5:33   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-05-31  9:17     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-06-01  6:15       ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-06-02 13:51         ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-06-02 14:39           ` Reinette Chatre
2023-06-14 13:02         ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-06-16  5:30           ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-06-16  6:44             ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-18 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] selftests/resctrl: Split measure_cache_vals() function Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:21   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-18 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] selftests/resctrl: Split show_cache_info() to test specific and generic parts Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:22   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-18 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] selftests/resctrl: Rewrite Cache Allocation Technology (CAT) test Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-22  0:32   ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-26 13:58     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-26 23:35       ` Reinette Chatre
2023-04-27  8:04         ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-04-27 15:15           ` Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5db5680-4123-17b8-e657-39ba20356259@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox