The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Ibrahim Hashimov <security@auditcode.ai>,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
Cc: shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scsi: scsi_debug: fix REPORT ZONES alloc_len underflow OOB write
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:03:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5dc6cdf9-1d25-40a5-bbe3-5d57585b46c9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710055755.53830-1-security@auditcode.ai>

On 7/10/26 14:57, Ibrahim Hashimov wrote:
> resp_report_zones() derives the number of zone descriptors that fit in
> the reply buffer from the command allocation length:
> 
> 	rep_max_zones = (alloc_len - 64) >> ilog2(RZONES_DESC_HD);
> 
> 	arr = kzalloc(alloc_len, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
> 
> alloc_len is taken directly from the CDB and is fully controlled by the
> initiator. When alloc_len is smaller than the 64-byte report header
> (RZONES_DESC_HD), the subtraction underflows and rep_max_zones becomes a
> huge value. The buffer is then allocated with only alloc_len bytes, which
> is smaller than the 64-byte header the code unconditionally writes, and
> the descriptor loop is bounded by the bogus rep_max_zones. Both the header
> store and the following zone descriptors are then written past the end of
> the undersized allocation, corrupting adjacent slab memory.
> 
> Fix it by sizing the buffer to a whole number of 64-byte blocks that
> cover the requested allocation length:
> 
> 	rep_max_zones =
> 		(ALIGN((u64)alloc_len, RZONES_DESC_HD) - RZONES_DESC_HD)
> 		>> ilog2(RZONES_DESC_HD);
> 	arr_len = (u64)RZONES_DESC_HD * (rep_max_zones + 1);
> 
> 	arr = kzalloc(arr_len, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
> 
> RZONES_DESC_HD is a power of two, so ALIGN() rounds alloc_len up to the
> next multiple of 64 and rep_max_zones can no longer underflow: for any
> alloc_len of 1 to 64 it is 0, so only the header is built. arr_len is
> always RZONES_DESC_HD * (rep_max_zones + 1), which is exactly large enough
> for the header plus every descriptor the loop may write, so the report is
> always assembled within bounds, including a possibly partial trailing
> zone descriptor. The existing copy-out still transfers only what the host
> asked for:
> 
> 	fill_from_dev_buffer(scp, arr, min_t(u32, alloc_len, rep_len));
> 
> so an allocation length that ends in the middle of a zone descriptor
> returns the correctly truncated partial descriptor, as permitted by the
> SCSI/ZBC specifications, while never reading past arr_len.
> 
> The aligned length and the buffer size are computed in 64-bit (alloc_len
> is cast to u64 before ALIGN and the size product uses a u64 block size) so
> a crafted allocation length near U32_MAX cannot wrap them to a small value;
> such a request simply fails the large allocation and returns a check
> condition instead of overflowing the buffer.
> 
> This was found by static analysis. A KASAN slab-out-of-bounds runtime
> reproduction of the original underflow is being re-run against the ALIGN
> based fix and will be reported separately.
> 
> Fixes: 7db0e0c8190a ("scsi: scsi_debug: Fix buffer size of REPORT ZONES command")
> Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ibrahim Hashimov <security@auditcode.ai>
> Assisted-by: AuditCode-AI:2026.07

Looks OK to me.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-10  6:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 15:06 [PATCH] scsi: scsi_debug: fix REPORT ZONES alloc_len underflow OOB write Ibrahim Hashimov
2026-07-09 19:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Ibrahim Hashimov
2026-07-10  0:58   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-07-10  5:57     ` [PATCH v3] " Ibrahim Hashimov
2026-07-10  6:03       ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-07-10  5:59     ` [PATCH v2] " Ibrahim Hashimov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5dc6cdf9-1d25-40a5-bbe3-5d57585b46c9@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=security@auditcode.ai \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox