From: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] KVM: X86: Extend KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS to inject a SHUTDOWN event
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:33:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f2012f7-80ba-c034-a098-cede4184a125@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yio4qknizH25MBkP@google.com>
On 3/11/2022 1:43 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
>> In some fatal case, the target vcpu would run into unexpected behavior
>> and should get shutdown (e.g. VM context is corrupted and not valid in
>> VMCS). User space would be informed in such case. To kill the target
>> vcpu, extend KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS ioctl to inject a synthesized SHUTDOWN
>> event with a new bit set in flags field. KVM would accordingly make
>> KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT request to trigger the real shutdown exit. Noting
>> that the KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT request also applies to the nested case,
>> so that only the target L2 vcpu would be killed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 +++++-
>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
>> index 691ff84444bd..d1971ef613e7 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
>> @@ -1241,6 +1241,9 @@ can be set in the flags field to signal that the
>> exception_has_payload, exception_payload, and exception.pending fields
>> contain a valid state and shall be written into the VCPU.
>>
>> +KVM_VCPUEVENT_SHUTDOWN can be set in flags field to synthesize a SHUTDOWN
>> +event for a vcpu from user space.
>> +
>> ARM/ARM64:
>> ^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> index bf6e96011dfe..44757bd6122d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ struct kvm_reinject_control {
>> #define KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SHADOW 0x00000004
>> #define KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM 0x00000008
>> #define KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_PAYLOAD 0x00000010
>> +#define KVM_VCPUEVENT_SHUTDOWN 0x00000020
>>
>> /* Interrupt shadow states */
>> #define KVM_X86_SHADOW_INT_MOV_SS 0x01
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 4fa4d8269e5b..53c8592066c8 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -4903,7 +4903,8 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> | KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SIPI_VECTOR
>> | KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SHADOW
>> | KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM
>> - | KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_PAYLOAD))
>> + | KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_PAYLOAD
>> + | KVM_VCPUEVENT_SHUTDOWN))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> if (events->flags & KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_PAYLOAD) {
>> @@ -4976,6 +4977,9 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + if (events->flags & KVM_VCPUEVENT_SHUTDOWN)
>> + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT, vcpu);
>
> Huh. I think we need to make this bidirection and add it to get_vcpu_events()
> as well, and treat it as a bug fix. In direct triple fault cases, i.e. hardware
> detected and morphed to VM-Exit, KVM will never lose the triple fault. But for
> triple faults sythesized by KVM, e.g. the RSM path or nested_vmx_abort(), if KVM
> exits to userspace before the request is serviced, userspace could migrate the
> VM and lose the triple fault.
Good catch. Then the name of this definition is not quit fit now. How
about changing to KVM_VCPUEVENT_SYTHESIZED_TRIPLE_FAULT?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-11 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-10 8:39 [PATCH v4 0/3] Introduce Notify VM exit Chenyi Qiang
2022-03-10 8:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] KVM: X86: Extend KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS to inject a SHUTDOWN event Chenyi Qiang
2022-03-10 17:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 2:33 ` Chenyi Qiang [this message]
2022-03-11 2:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-10 8:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] KVM: VMX: Enable Notify VM exit Chenyi Qiang
2022-03-10 8:40 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] KVM: Add document for KVM_CAP_X86_NOTIFY_VMEXIT and KVM_EXIT_NOTIFY Chenyi Qiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5f2012f7-80ba-c034-a098-cede4184a125@intel.com \
--to=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox