From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD74212D7C; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 15:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736522786; cv=none; b=TdhPikEqn39yisX2yOJ5G3LRdenJEIR9lEJTCEn31MvQJrcMo+QQPYoJDN5EE4IQivB06b4Nq09MapsvhWdlnZmbTNZRXl8HLYKbQK2AGgAvjHFRLyWl6fQT8cJKJz+Frhbyv6vmu4Gzjxn+Ci6tggnSnr1QkWnlWxB06aSKtxo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736522786; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Jgs6Kgq09XtdCkvxRLfEWGHvPFq70cuabsdqe/U5DM4=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=r9+zOIITAqMwHliRSwEuUU8HCQZoUm79ejwr7nehN9EQN8PCQvakj3nqX9Hh8Ywx0Rjjj6poLNI7ruzRZQesMUFN7B2v+o+jGUxtP0YL9BxGgzRar7Dqmrj/W75+POE60mN2XrND5wf+9F0ksbNGpd52qAJ8xYHIUhW2Yi1RkhI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=P7jYZUFs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="P7jYZUFs" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1736522785; x=1768058785; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Jgs6Kgq09XtdCkvxRLfEWGHvPFq70cuabsdqe/U5DM4=; b=P7jYZUFsvYTr6uJDiJ3s3jvYS1NKXkcMoa9U3cnuX0+zec45popYzB6o ZJ8ULn9Qwz2CLMwCNlU0tbFifi4CWMeR128FujDVD9RJ/doiq56IOObso l75D5vr7Bhx1pqBkxKoE5QD5+GOZC+tQ0+/JgfLQb67oZ/UFbNgPfbBkb iaaE9uMf/naliekYQmoQOPXfkn60hYS/580+Q3AdRjQGQo1djGvupBukn zTJDG2WuWleF3Bs03H4mR6b2b55vJdIkLjyJMye+jf7Rh2bupd/FlEu53 qjrRuzj5o0ZU+LRt7aTbof0vbEljkCrA2wsPeOH3ni9VC4gHpaCCKtIGV A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 95CfGfULRmSm8WlzBg3YOA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: kMLxhDl4TaSimyQHx0XzHA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11311"; a="36706450" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,303,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="36706450" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jan 2025 07:26:24 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ImZLxQzhSRGVt+fTre0n2A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: A6zKU2FCT0ODO8rHwOQ56w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="108398000" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jan 2025 07:26:24 -0800 Received: from abityuts-desk1.ger.corp.intel.com (abityuts-desk1.fi.intel.com [10.237.68.150]) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C2B20B5714; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 07:26:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5f24fe01b6dd0ae0e6d91209e143f2faff6ae017.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] SRF: Fix offline CPU preventing pc6 entry From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Dave Hansen , Patryk Wlazlyn , x86@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 17:26:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20250110115953.6058-1-patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.4 (3.52.4-2.fc40) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 07:17 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 1/10/25 03:59, Patryk Wlazlyn wrote: > > Patryk Wlazlyn (4): > > =C2=A0 x86/smp: Allow calling mwait_play_dead with an arbitrary hint > > =C2=A0 ACPI: processor_idle: Add FFH state handling > > =C2=A0 intel_idle: Provide the default enter_dead() handler > > =C2=A0 x86/smp: Eliminate mwait_play_dead_cpuid_hint() > >=20 > > =C2=A0arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 |=C2=A0 3 +++ > > =C2=A0arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 10 ++++++++ > > =C2=A0arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 | 46 ++++------= ------------------------- > > =C2=A0drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |=C2=A0 2 ++ > > =C2=A0drivers/idle/intel_idle.c=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 | 15 ++++++++++= ++ > > =C2=A0include/acpi/processor.h=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 |=C2=A0 5 = ++++ > > =C2=A06 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) >=20 > Is everybody happy with this now? >=20 > I noticed there are no Fixes: or Cc:stable@ tags on this. Should we be > treating this like a new feature or a bug fix? It would be very helpful to have this in v6.12, because it is LTS. So I wou= ld suggest Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.12 Thanks, Artem.