From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAC5C3815B for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942FF2064A for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1416161AbgDOQfK (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:35:10 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:49794 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1416090AbgDOQfG (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:35:06 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725901FB; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.37.9.9] (unknown [10.37.9.9]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 430EC3F6C4; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: add the time namespace support To: Andrei Vagin Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Dmitry Safonov References: <20200225073731.465270-1-avagin@gmail.com> <1c1ab662-5475-9d8b-038b-8411b060202a@arm.com> <1d9c4c56-af16-e54f-08ca-76c6570b2d53@arm.com> From: Vincenzo Frascino Message-ID: <5f60bff9-0fe1-7f1f-2dcc-2a7363801897@arm.com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:35:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrei, On 4/15/20 5:14 PM, Andrei Vagin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:02 AM Vincenzo Frascino > wrote: >> >> Hi Andrei, >> >> On 4/11/20 8:33 AM, Andrei Vagin wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:23 AM Vincenzo Frascino >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I have though a question on something I encountered during the testing of the >>>> patches: I noticed that all the tests related to CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM fail on >>>> arm64 (please find the results below the scissors). Is this expected? >>> >>> static int alarm_clock_get_timespec(clockid_t which_clock, struct >>> timespec64 *tp) >>> { >>> struct alarm_base *base = &alarm_bases[clock2alarm(which_clock)]; >>> >>> if (!alarmtimer_get_rtcdev()) >>> return -EINVAL; >>> >>> It is probably that you get EINVAL from here ^^^. I will send a >>> separate patch to handle this case in tests properly. >>> >> >> This makes sense :) Please let me know when you post the fix so I can test it again. > > I have sent this fix: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/15/72 > That's good, I will try it by the end of this week or beginning of next and let you know the results. >> >> Are you planning as well to rebase this set?> > What is the right tree to rebase on? > I guess master, I was asking because it would make easier my testing :) > Thanks, > Andrei > -- Regards, Vincenzo