public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>, <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Robert Elliott <elliott@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] rcu: Add RCU stall diagnosis information
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 20:32:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f73bb77-e334-d604-d0cd-0ce7af45f209@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221114112438.GA472998@lothringen>



On 2022/11/14 19:24, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 09:07:07PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> Because RCU CPU stall warnings are driven from the scheduling-clock
>> interrupt handler, a workload consisting of a very large number of
>> short-duration hardware interrupts can result in misleading stall-warning
>> messages.  On systems supporting only a single level of interrupts,
>> that is, where interrupts handlers cannot be interrupted, this can
>> produce misleading diagnostics.  The stack traces will show the
>> innocent-bystander interrupted task, not the interrupts that are
>> at the very least exacerbating the stall.
>>
>> This situation can be improved by displaying the number of interrupts
>> and the CPU time that they have consumed.  Diagnosing other types
>> of stalls can be eased by also providing the count of softirqs and
>> the CPU time that they consumed as well as the number of context
>> switches and the task-level CPU time consumed.
>>
>> Consider the following output given this change:
>>
>> rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
>> rcu:     0-....: (1250 ticks this GP) <omitted>
>> rcu:          hardirqs   softirqs   csw/system
>> rcu:  number:      624         45            0
>> rcu: cputime:       69          1         2425   ==> 2500(ms)
>>
>> This output shows that the number of hard and soft interrupts is small,
>> there are no context switches, and the system takes up a lot of time. This
>> indicates that the current task is looping with preemption disabled.
>>
>> The impact on system performance is negligible because snapshot is
>> recorded only once for all continuous RCU stalls.
>>
>> This added debugging information is suppressed by default and can be
>> enabled by building the kernel with CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y or
>> by booting with rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_cputime=1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  6 ++++
>>  kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug                      | 11 +++++++
>>  kernel/rcu/rcu.h                              |  1 +
>>  kernel/rcu/tree.c                             | 18 +++++++++++
>>  kernel/rcu/tree.h                             | 19 ++++++++++++
>>  kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h                       | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  kernel/rcu/update.c                           |  2 ++
>>  7 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>> index 811b2e6d4672685..ee7d9d962591c5d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>> @@ -5084,6 +5084,12 @@
>>  			rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_timeout to be used (after
>>  			conversion from seconds to milliseconds).
>>  
>> +	rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_cputime= [KNL]
>> +			Provide statistics on the cputime and count of
>> +			interrupts and tasks during the sampling period. For
>> +			multiple continuous RCU stalls, all sampling periods
>> +			begin at half of the first RCU stall timeout.
>> +
>>  	rcupdate.rcu_expedited= [KNL]
>>  			Use expedited grace-period primitives, for
>>  			example, synchronize_rcu_expedited() instead
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug
>> index 1b0c41d490f0588..025566a9ba44667 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug
>> @@ -95,6 +95,17 @@ config RCU_EXP_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT
>>  	  says to use the RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT value converted from
>>  	  seconds to milliseconds.
>>  
>> +config RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME
>> +	bool "Provide additional RCU stall debug information"
>> +	depends on RCU_STALL_COMMON
>> +	default n
>> +	help
>> +	  Collect statistics during the sampling period, such as the number of
>> +	  (hard interrupts, soft interrupts, task switches) and the cputime of
>> +	  (hard interrupts, soft interrupts, kernel tasks) are added to the
>> +	  RCU stall report. For multiple continuous RCU stalls, all sampling
>> +	  periods begin at half of the first RCU stall timeout.
>> +
>>  config RCU_TRACE
>>  	bool "Enable tracing for RCU"
>>  	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
>> index 96122f203187f39..4844dec36bddb48 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
>> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ extern int rcu_cpu_stall_ftrace_dump;
>>  extern int rcu_cpu_stall_suppress;
>>  extern int rcu_cpu_stall_timeout;
>>  extern int rcu_exp_cpu_stall_timeout;
>> +extern int rcu_cpu_stall_cputime;
>>  int rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check(void);
>>  int rcu_exp_jiffies_till_stall_check(void);
>>  
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>> index ed93ddb8203d42c..3921aacfd421ba9 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>> @@ -866,6 +866,24 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>>  			rdp->rcu_iw_gp_seq = rnp->gp_seq;
>>  			irq_work_queue_on(&rdp->rcu_iw, rdp->cpu);
>>  		}
>> +
>> +		if (rcu_cpu_stall_cputime && rdp->snap_record.gp_seq != rdp->gp_seq) {
>> +			int cpu = rdp->cpu;
>> +			struct rcu_snap_record *rsrp;
>> +			struct kernel_cpustat *kcsp;
>> +
>> +			kcsp = &kcpustat_cpu(cpu);
>> +
>> +			rsrp = &rdp->snap_record;
>> +			rsrp->cputime_irq     = kcpustat_field(kcsp, CPUTIME_IRQ, cpu);
>> +			rsrp->cputime_softirq = kcpustat_field(kcsp, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ, cpu);
>> +			rsrp->cputime_system  = kcpustat_field(kcsp, CPUTIME_SYSTEM, cpu);
>> +			rsrp->nr_hardirqs = kstat_cpu_irqs_sum(rdp->cpu);
>> +			rsrp->nr_softirqs = kstat_cpu_softirqs_sum(rdp->cpu);
> 
> Getting the sum of all CPU's IRQs, with even two iterations on all of them, look
> costly. So I have to ask: why is this information useful and why can't we deduce
> it from other CPUs stall reports?

Only the RCU stalled CPUs are recorded. Why all CPUs?

static void force_qs_rnp(int (*f)(struct rcu_data *rdp))
{
	rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp) {
		if (rnp->qsmask == 0) {
			continue;
		}
		for_each_leaf_node_cpu_mask(rnp, cpu, rnp->qsmask) {
			if (f(rdp))

> 
> I'm also asking because this rcu_cpu_stall_cputime is likely to be very useful for
> distros, to the point that I expect it to be turned on by default as doing a
> snapshot of kcpustat fields is cheap. But doing that wide CPU snapshot is
> definetly going to be an unbearable overhead.

I purposely added a print test, only the RCU stalled CPU would be taken snapshots and
calculated differentials.

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index d1f0d857dc85df5..693e7c83bd17d1e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -872,6 +872,7 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
                        struct rcu_snap_record *rsrp;
                        struct kernel_cpustat *kcsp;

+                       printk("fixme: cpu=%d\n", smp_processor_id());
                        kcsp = &kcpustat_cpu(cpu);

                        rsrp = &rdp->snap_record;

> 
> Thanks.
> .
> 

-- 
Regards,
  Zhen Lei

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-14 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-11 13:07 [PATCH v7 0/6] rcu: Add RCU stall diagnosis information Zhen Lei
2022-11-11 13:07 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] genirq: Fix the return type of kstat_cpu_irqs_sum() Zhen Lei
2022-11-11 13:07 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] sched: Add helper kstat_cpu_softirqs_sum() Zhen Lei
2022-11-14 11:42   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-14 12:45     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-14 12:50       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-14 14:26         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-11 13:07 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] sched: Add helper nr_context_switches_cpu() Zhen Lei
2022-11-11 13:07 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] rcu: Add RCU stall diagnosis information Zhen Lei
2022-11-14 11:24   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-14 12:32     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown) [this message]
2022-11-14 12:46       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-16 22:39   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-17  1:57     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-17 12:22       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-17 13:25         ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-17 14:26           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-18  2:03             ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-11 13:07 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] doc: Document CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y stall information Zhen Lei
2022-11-16 22:55   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-17  2:03     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-17 12:23       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-11 13:07 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] rcu: Align the output of RCU stall Zhen Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5f73bb77-e334-d604-d0cd-0ce7af45f209@huawei.com \
    --to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=elliott@hpe.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox