The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
	Das Sandipan <Sandipan.Das@amd.com>,
	Shukla Manali <Manali.Shukla@amd.com>,
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Support PERF_METRICS MSR in mediated vPMU
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 08:56:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fa22009-0606-4523-9a84-e49c9b67fde2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817183143.226156-6-zide.chen@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

On 8/18/2026 2:31 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
> From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
>
> Bit 15 in IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES indicates that the CPU provides
> built-in support for Topdown Microarchitecture Analysis (TMA) L1
> metrics via the IA32_PERF_METRICS MSR.
>
> Expose this capability only when mediated vPMU is enabled, as emulating
> IA32_PERF_METRICS in the legacy vPMU model is impractical.
>
> Pass IA32_PERF_METRICS through to the guest only when mediated vPMU is
> enabled and bit 15 is set in guest IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES.  Allow
> kvm_pmu_{get,set}_msr() to handle this MSR for host accesses.
>
> Save and restore this MSR on host/guest PMU context switches so that
> host PMU activity does not clobber the guest value, and guest state
> is not leaked into the host.
>
> If the host supports PERF_METRICS but it is not exposed to the guest,
> MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL must be intercepted so the guest cannot
> enable PERF_METRICS via GLOBAL_CTRL[48].
>
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> v8:
> - Intercept global ctrl MSR if host supports PerfMetrics but not
>   enabled in the guest.
> v7:
> - Clear bit 48 in global_ctrl_rsvd instead of explicitly clearing it in
>   global_status_rsvd, allowing it to propagate through the assignment
>   from global_ctrl_rsvd.
> - Add comments documenting the all-zero PERF_METRICS/FC3 write-order
>   exception.
> - Add nested_vmx_merge_msr_bitmaps_rw(MSR_PERF_METRICS);
> v5:
> - Remove host_initiated check in set/get MSR handlers.
> v4:
> - Remove WARN_ON_ONCE() and simply reject the guest accesses by checking
>   host_initiated. (Sashiko)
> - Passthru MSR_PERF_METRICS only if has_mediated_pmu is true. (Sashiko)
> - Remove the redundant !! in vcpu_has_perf_metrics().
> v3:
> - Replace WARN_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE(). (Dapeng)
> - Add comments to explain why we don't validate writes on PERF_METRICS.
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h  |  1 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c              |  6 +++++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c               |  7 +++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h               |  5 +++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c        |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c     | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c           |  7 +++++++
>  8 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index d893fa5be838..7166efdf79ce 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -583,6 +583,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
>  	u64 global_status_rsvd;
>  	u64 reserved_bits;
>  	u64 raw_event_mask;
> +	u64 perf_metrics;
>  	struct kvm_pmc gp_counters[KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS];
>  	struct kvm_pmc fixed_counters[KVM_MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS];
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 18c4be75e927..fdcaeb6c8352 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@
>  #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT		0xf00
>  #define PERF_CAP_FW_WRITES		BIT_ULL(13)
>  #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE		BIT_ULL(14)
> +#define PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS		BIT_ULL(15)
>  #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_TIMING_INFO	BIT_ULL(17)
>  #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_MASK		(PERF_CAP_PEBS_TRAP | PERF_CAP_ARCH_REG | \
>  					 PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT | PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE | \
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c b/arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c
> index 1fbd8f08a7f0..2b2cc6bf3ce7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static const u32 msrs_to_save_pmu[] = {
>  	MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR0, MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR1,
>  	MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR2, MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR3,
>  	MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS,
> -	MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL,
> +	MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, MSR_PERF_METRICS,
>  	MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, MSR_IA32_DS_AREA, MSR_PEBS_DATA_CFG,
>  
>  	/* This part of MSRs should match KVM_MAX_NR_INTEL_GP_COUNTERS. */
> @@ -2608,6 +2608,10 @@ static void kvm_probe_msr_to_save(u32 msr_index)
>  		     intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges) * 2))
>  			return;
>  		break;
> +	case MSR_PERF_METRICS:
> +		if (!(kvm_caps.supported_perf_cap & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS))
> +			return;
> +		break;
>  	case MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 ...
>  	     MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 + KVM_MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS - 1:
>  		if (msr_index - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 >=
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> index 913a0ecbf260..2fddcbc8924d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
> @@ -806,9 +806,16 @@ static bool kvm_need_any_pmc_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	       pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters != kvm_host_pmu.num_counters_fixed;
>  }
>  
> +static bool kvm_need_perf_metrics_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return (kvm_host.perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS) &&
> +		!kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu);
> +}
> +
>  bool kvm_need_perf_global_ctrl_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	return kvm_need_any_pmc_intercept(vcpu) ||
> +	       kvm_need_perf_metrics_intercept(vcpu) ||
>  	       !kvm_pmu_has_perf_global_ctrl(vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu));
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM_INTERNAL(kvm_need_perf_global_ctrl_intercept);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
> index 82f955e5a450..be578013ed83 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
> @@ -279,6 +279,11 @@ static inline u64 kvm_vcpu_get_perf_caps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return kvm_vcpu_get_perf_caps(vcpu) & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS;
> +}
> +
>  void kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  int kvm_pmu_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned pmc, u64 *data);
>  int kvm_pmu_check_rdpmc_early(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index 7ed79894d11d..e81b8a5423c8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -717,6 +717,8 @@ static void nested_vmx_merge_pmu_msr_bitmaps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	nested_vmx_merge_msr_bitmaps_rw(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL);
>  	nested_vmx_merge_msr_bitmaps_read(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS);
>  	nested_vmx_merge_msr_bitmaps_write(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL);
> +
> +	nested_vmx_merge_msr_bitmaps_rw(MSR_PERF_METRICS);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> index 100c072b7fb3..1fd0480baf68 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> @@ -189,6 +189,8 @@ static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
>  	switch (msr) {
>  	case MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL:
>  		return kvm_pmu_has_perf_global_ctrl(pmu);
> +	case MSR_PERF_METRICS:
> +		return kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu);
>  	case MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE:
>  		ret = kvm_vcpu_get_perf_caps(vcpu) & PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT;
>  		break;
> @@ -346,6 +348,9 @@ static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>  	case MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL:
>  		msr_info->data = pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl;
>  		break;
> +	case MSR_PERF_METRICS:
> +		msr_info->data = pmu->perf_metrics;
> +		break;
>  	case MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE:
>  		msr_info->data = pmu->pebs_enable;
>  		break;
> @@ -395,6 +400,14 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>  		if (pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl != data)
>  			reprogram_fixed_counters(pmu, data);
>  		break;
> +	case MSR_PERF_METRICS:
> +		/*
> +		 * Bits [63:32] are ignored on hardware that supports only
> +		 * level-1 metrics, but may be valid on hardware that supports
> +		 * level-2 metrics. Preserve guest writes verbatim.
> +		 */
> +		pmu->perf_metrics = data;
> +		break;
>  	case MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE:
>  		if (data & pmu->pebs_enable_rsvd)
>  			return 1;
> @@ -577,6 +590,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	counter_rsvd = ~((BIT_ULL(pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters) - 1) |
>  			 ((BIT_ULL(pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters) - 1) << KVM_FIXED_PMC_BASE_IDX));
>  	pmu->global_ctrl_rsvd = counter_rsvd;
> +	if (perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS)
> +		pmu->global_ctrl_rsvd &= ~GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * GLOBAL_STATUS and GLOBAL_OVF_CONTROL (a.k.a. GLOBAL_STATUS_RESET)
> @@ -633,6 +648,9 @@ static void intel_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  static void intel_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> +	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> +
> +	pmu->perf_metrics = 0;
>  	intel_pmu_release_guest_lbr_event(vcpu);
>  }
>  
> @@ -803,6 +821,9 @@ static void intel_mediated_pmu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
>  	u64 global_status, toggle;
>  
> +	if (kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu))
> +		wrmsrq(MSR_PERF_METRICS, pmu->perf_metrics);
> +
>  	rdmsrq(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS, global_status);
>  	toggle = pmu->global_status ^ global_status;
>  	if (global_status & toggle)
> @@ -831,6 +852,19 @@ static void intel_mediated_pmu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	 */
>  	if (pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl_hw)
>  		wrmsrq(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, 0);
> +
> +	if (kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu)) {
> +		pmu->perf_metrics = rdpmc(INTEL_PMC_FIXED_RDPMC_METRICS);
> +		/*
> +		 * The SDM requires restoring fixed counter 3 before
> +		 * PERF_METRICS. However, this path writes 0 to PERF_METRICS
> +		 * before fixed counter 3. For this all-zero case, the
> +		 * resulting hardware state is therefore the same regardless
> +		 * of write order.
> +		 */
> +		if (pmu->perf_metrics)
> +			wrmsrq(MSR_PERF_METRICS, 0);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops __initdata = {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 6e9d197982b7..8cb9d642277a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -4277,6 +4277,10 @@ static void vmx_recalc_pmu_msr_intercepts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  				  MSR_TYPE_RW, intercept);
>  	vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL,
>  				  MSR_TYPE_RW, intercept);
> +
> +	intercept = !has_mediated_pmu || !kvm_vcpu_has_perf_metrics(vcpu);
> +	vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_PERF_METRICS,
> +				  MSR_TYPE_RW, intercept);
>  }
>  
>  static void vmx_recalc_msr_intercepts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -8068,6 +8072,9 @@ static __init u64 vmx_get_perf_capabilities(void)
>  		perf_cap &= ~PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (enable_mediated_pmu)
> +		perf_cap |= kvm_host.perf_capabilities & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS;
> +
>  	return perf_cap;
>  }
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-20  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-17 18:31 [PATCH v8 0/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Add hardware Topdown metrics support Zide Chen
2026-08-17 18:31 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Do not map fixed counters >= 3 to generic perf events Zide Chen
2026-08-17 18:31 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Support Intel fixed counter 3 on mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-08-17 18:31 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Rename and move vcpu_get_perf_capabilities() to pmu.h Zide Chen
2026-08-17 18:31 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Snapshot host IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES in kvm_host Zide Chen
2026-08-17 18:31 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Support PERF_METRICS MSR in mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-08-20  0:56   ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-08-17 18:31 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Move RDPMC emulation into per-vendor callbacks Zide Chen
2026-08-19  3:14   ` Sandipan Das
2026-08-17 18:31 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Emulate RDPMC on performance metrics Zide Chen
2026-08-18 17:41   ` Andi Kleen
2026-08-18 18:30     ` Chen, Zide
2026-08-18 19:24       ` Andi Kleen
2026-08-18 19:59         ` Chen, Zide
2026-08-17 18:31 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] KVM: selftests: Add PERF_METRICS and fixed counter 3 tests Zide Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5fa22009-0606-4523-9a84-e49c9b67fde2@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Manali.Shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=Sandipan.Das@amd.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox