From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 030AF37756A; Tue, 12 May 2026 15:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778599029; cv=none; b=ZjgbJK7KVbph2ja2dh5Kcncv7cddsJszkq9PvvKugMAj25vUdxqchCN4xOVvhgjzOnLCV33S/4Ayfawgdna08o/aiWXRaMHrR+DzH0RhCTa13ojLB3ac4IkXjSD9Q1UwxL57ows50xfMuwYeWikCdZ5BVqOdbkiVMAEprOJMH3Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778599029; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vwfgL5zvwV2wGTNtZAe18eQy5moRZJzohFndJQsPqnI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QoWJxjHd5tieDE/oYwLfdxisZscpBAFVpDj+JGTBCt8K5nayLmEatHchP9R35hfKuDFYsx7GtZ5D1tqpO0qS3iDjuZzJkMIxrzovDJHPeqXIuSkYDquVIrWjkBB4WghxiO8eMgzzUz3xDHWNEaVW3/T1oXZW0nPUr8k6jdv0s+o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=LGr3zWo8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LGr3zWo8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1C24C2BCFC; Tue, 12 May 2026 15:17:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778599028; bh=vwfgL5zvwV2wGTNtZAe18eQy5moRZJzohFndJQsPqnI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=LGr3zWo8KSrTl7rPu/F+bhSzKUS77fSEDKRjHf9Pi5Tl+MAkQ+BeCJAd2/jxzs33w 4ZTD3/z85CBGuHbxmb4EISahW3v9XPVMCqPFsffqIkvVjkXJuY7QUf2YvGUNEUKD55 cE3JsGwpeE7k6J/FLan1Wjjvc4pCwnhnDd/sKajbZ8om1FSbPh8UolO64hFoLPI7om uEC1sy3vMPAbd55ovpXyxblaOC+go4f5p+AYJuG7SJj+RhtZf2rHR8XK25oZsF35KQ FP5UZgwtmMqFKPCJrL55Q3cw2ak6zMG2C543e7UopuUNIMKUiD1nhtVQPO180Wucev uLiieQLYJm+Ag== From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Ilpo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Cc: Hans de Goede , LKML , Linux ACPI , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Ho , Eric Piel , Alex Hung , Shravan Sudhakar , AceLan Kao Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/x86: Check ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 17:10:35 +0200 Message-ID: <6007701.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki> Organization: Linux Kernel Development Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi All, This series replaces https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/4731840.LvFx2qVVIh@rafael.j.wysocki/ and as a whole it makes exactly the same code changes. Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion object need to verify its presence. Accordingly, add requisite ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() checks against NULL to 5 platform/x86 drivers where they are missing. Thanks!