From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
corbet@lwn.net, tony.luck@intel.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com,
james.morse@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com,
david@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, fvdl@google.com,
seanjc@google.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, yosry.ahmed@linux.dev,
sohil.mehta@intel.com, xin@zytor.com, kai.huang@intel.com,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, me@mixaill.net,
mario.limonciello@amd.com, xin3.li@intel.com,
ebiggers@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
chang.seok.bae@intel.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
perry.yuan@amd.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, manali.shukla@amd.com,
gautham.shenoy@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 08/10] fs/resctrl: Modify rdt_parse_data to pass mode and CLOSID
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 13:40:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <601a28ca-143c-4821-8c78-9227a17012d5@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b08c1d64-8d19-48e7-853a-21947d61ff98@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On 8/7/25 20:52, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 8/5/25 4:30 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> parse_cbm() and parse_bw() require mode and CLOSID to validate the Capacity
>
> Again [1], parse_bw() does not validate any CBMs.
Removed parse_bw() reference.
>
> To be more specific: "mode" -> "resource group mode"?
Sure.
>
>> Bit Mask (CBM). It is passed via struct rdtgroup in struct rdt_parse_data.
>>
>> The io_alloc feature also uses CBMs to indicate which portions of cache are
>> allocated for I/O traffic. The CBMs are provided by user space and need to
>> be validated the same as CBMs provided for general (CPU) cache allocation.
>> parse_cbm() cannot be used as-is since io_alloc does not have rdtgroup
>> context.
>>
>> Pass the mode and CLOSID directly to parse_cbm() via struct rdt_parse_data
>> instead of through the rdtgroup struct to facilitate calling parse_cbm() to
>> verify the CBM of the io_alloc feature.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
>> ---
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -156,9 +157,10 @@ static bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
>> static int parse_cbm(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct resctrl_schema *s,
>> struct rdt_ctrl_domain *d)
>> {
>> - struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp = data->rdtgrp;
>> + enum rdtgrp_mode mode = data->mode;
>> struct resctrl_staged_config *cfg;
>> struct rdt_resource *r = s->res;
>> + u32 closid = data->closid;
>> u32 cbm_val;
>>
>> cfg = &d->staged_config[s->conf_type];
>> @@ -171,7 +173,7 @@ static int parse_cbm(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct resctrl_schema *s,
>> * Cannot set up more than one pseudo-locked region in a cache
>> * hierarchy.
>> */
>> - if (rdtgrp->mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP &&
>> + if (mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP &&
>> rdtgroup_pseudo_locked_in_hierarchy(d)) {
>> rdt_last_cmd_puts("Pseudo-locked region in hierarchy\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -180,8 +182,8 @@ static int parse_cbm(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct resctrl_schema *s,
>> if (!cbm_validate(data->buf, &cbm_val, r))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - if ((rdtgrp->mode == RDT_MODE_EXCLUSIVE ||
>> - rdtgrp->mode == RDT_MODE_SHAREABLE) &&
>> + if ((mode == RDT_MODE_EXCLUSIVE ||
>> + mode == RDT_MODE_SHAREABLE) &&
>
> This can now be on one line?
Sure.
>
>> rdtgroup_cbm_overlaps_pseudo_locked(d, cbm_val)) {
>> rdt_last_cmd_puts("CBM overlaps with pseudo-locked region\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>
> Reinette
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/798ba4db-3ac2-44a9-9e0d-e9cbb0dbff45@intel.com/
>
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-26 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 23:30 [PATCH v8 00/10] x86,fs/resctrl: Support L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement (SDCIAE) Babu Moger
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for L3 Smart Data Cache Injection Allocation Enforcement Babu Moger
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] x86/resctrl: Add SDCIAE feature in the command line options Babu Moger
2025-08-08 1:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-22 22:07 ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] x86,fs/resctrl: Detect io_alloc feature Babu Moger
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] x86,fs/resctrl: Implement "io_alloc" enable/disable handlers Babu Moger
2025-08-08 1:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-22 22:10 ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] fs/resctrl: Introduce interface to display "io_alloc" support Babu Moger
2025-08-08 1:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-22 22:12 ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] fs/resctrl: Add user interface to enable/disable io_alloc feature Babu Moger
2025-08-08 1:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-22 22:53 ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-27 20:39 ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-29 2:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-02 16:20 ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-21 5:02 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-08-22 23:10 ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] fs/resctrl: Introduce interface to display io_alloc CBMs Babu Moger
2025-08-08 1:51 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-26 18:33 ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] fs/resctrl: Modify rdt_parse_data to pass mode and CLOSID Babu Moger
2025-08-08 1:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-26 18:40 ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] fs/resctrl: Introduce interface to modify io_alloc Capacity Bit Masks Babu Moger
2025-08-08 1:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-26 18:53 ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-05 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] fs/resctrl: Update bit_usage to reflect io_alloc Babu Moger
2025-08-08 1:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-08-26 22:51 ` Moger, Babu
2025-08-29 3:11 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-09-02 16:32 ` Moger, Babu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=601a28ca-143c-4821-8c78-9227a17012d5@amd.com \
--to=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manali.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=me@mixaill.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).