From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266149AbUBCW03 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:26:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266150AbUBCW03 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:26:29 -0500 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]:59838 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266149AbUBCW02 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:26:28 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 14:26:19 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Dave Hansen , Alok Mooley cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm Subject: Re: Active Memory Defragmentation: Our implementation & problems Message-ID: <6020000.1075847179@flay> In-Reply-To: <1075843615.28252.17.camel@nighthawk> References: <20040203044651.47686.qmail@web9705.mail.yahoo.com> <1075843615.28252.17.camel@nighthawk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I'll stop there for now. There seems to be a lot of code in the file > that's one-off from current kernel code. I think a close examination of > currently available kernel functions could drasticly reduce the size of > your module. Preferably to 0 ... this should be part of the core kernel, not a module. M.