public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	kernel-team@android.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable-4.4.y backport] KVM: arm/arm64: Don't reschedule in unmap_stage2_range()
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:55:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <603f4cc58f697a3e1e5896f9bd2478e6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200824112854.24651-1-will@kernel.org>

On 2020-08-24 12:28, Will Deacon wrote:
> Upstream commits fdfe7cbd5880 ("KVM: Pass MMU notifier range flags to
> kvm_unmap_hva_range()") and b5331379bc62 ("KVM: arm64: Only reschedule
> if MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_BLOCKABLE is not set") fix a "sleeping from 
> invalid
> context" BUG caused by unmap_stage2_range() attempting to reschedule 
> when
> called on the OOM path.
> 
> Unfortunately, these patches rely on the MMU notifier callback being
> passed knowledge about whether or not blocking is permitted, which was
> introduced in 4.19. Rather than backport this considerable amount of
> infrastructure just for KVM on arm, instead just remove the conditional
> reschedule.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.4 only
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> index e0267532bd4e..edd392fdc14b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -300,14 +300,6 @@ static void unmap_range(struct kvm *kvm, pgd_t 
> *pgdp,
>  		next = kvm_pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
>  		if (!pgd_none(*pgd))
>  			unmap_puds(kvm, pgd, addr, next);
> -		/*
> -		 * If we are dealing with a large range in
> -		 * stage2 table, release the kvm->mmu_lock
> -		 * to prevent starvation and lockup detector
> -		 * warnings.
> -		 */
> -		if (kvm && (next != end))
> -			cond_resched_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>  	} while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
>  }

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-24 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-24 11:28 [PATCH stable-4.4.y backport] KVM: arm/arm64: Don't reschedule in unmap_stage2_range() Will Deacon
2020-08-24 12:55 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-08-24 16:16 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=603f4cc58f697a3e1e5896f9bd2478e6@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox