From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755844AbaFYJ3n (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:29:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1187 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753546AbaFYJ3Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:29:24 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1403683888.1960.35.camel@x220> References: <1403683888.1960.35.camel@x220> To: Paul Bolle Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Jiri Kosina , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] Documentation: Fix typo 'CONFIG_AFS' Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:09:15 +0100 Message-ID: <6075.1403687355@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Bolle wrote: > Perhaps AF_RXRPC should be dropped from this short list (it is selected > if AFS_FS is set). But since I couldn't actually determine how AFS_FS > and RXKAD interact I decided to not touch that list any further. The key_type_rxrpc key that the AFS fs or userspace passes to AF_RXRPC indicates the protocol that AF_RXRPC should use. The AFS fs doesn't need to care how the security actually works and the token is opaque to it. rxkad registers itself with AF_RXRPC, which maintains a list. The security_index is the number that appears in the protocol that indicates the security driver to use. David