public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Mary Edie Meredith <maryedie@osdl.org>,
	lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [OSDL][BENCHMARK] DBT-2  2.5.65/mjb/osdl comparison data
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:46:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60870000.1048895207@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1048889724.2535.329.camel@ibm-e.pdx.osdl.net>

Looks like you're going to get more bang for the buck for this
benchmark by playing around with some of the IO stuff like readahead
or whatever ...

00000000 total                                    6309908  36.9433
c01089b0 default_idle                             6187707 96682.9219

Not all that much room for improvment with CPU efficiency ;-)

M.

--On Friday, March 28, 2003 14:15:24 -0800 Mary Edie Meredith <maryedie@osdl.org> wrote:

> We have now comparison data for DBT-2 (readprofile included) from
> multiple kernels. To provide a quick comparison for those not
> familiar with DBT-2, we've compared the results, using 2.5.65 stock
> as the baseline (bigger is better).
> 
>                         Score           Score
> Kernel                  Cached          Non-Cached
> 2.5.65 base             100 (baseline)  100
> 2.5.65-mjb2 HZ=100      90.95           99.26
> 2.5.65-mjb2 HZ=1000     102.38          99.92
> 2.5.65-osdl1            101.69          99.89
> 2.5.64-osdl1            104.16          99.67
> 
> HZ is defined as 1000 in the base and osdl1 kernels. mjb2 kernel uses
> Andrew Morton / Dave Hansen patch making HZ a config option of
> 100 Hz or 1000 Hz).  Also we reversed out the 400-shpte patch.
> 
> Link to .config, readprofiles, metric info, raw data:
> 
> http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/8way/MJB65/8way_2_5_65.html
> 
> 
> Guided tour:
> 
> At the top of the screen, you will see a row that includes the .config
> and the readprofile data for each kernel tested.
> 
> Next is the list of runs of each type, the average metric (Green
> line) bigger numbers are better. The first set of these is the
> cached workload case, second is non-cached.
> 
> Click on "Raw data" for the vmstat, iostat raw info from each run of
> that kernel and workload type.
> 
> 
> Just some things noticed looking at the vmstat plotted data:
> 
> Notible difference in processes waiting for run time, all 2.5.65
> are high relative to 2.5.64(the last frame) for the cached case
> (first row of frames) in these plots:
> http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/8way/MJB65/r.html
> 
> 
> Of course, interrupts are down for the HZ=100 case (second frame,
> both rows):
> http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/8way/MJB65/In.html
> 
> Context switches per second slightly down to for HZ=100:
> http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/8way/MJB65/cs.html
> 
> Moving on to 2.5.66 to escape problems with "sleep".
> 
> Mary Meredith
> Mark Wong
> Cliff White
> 
> Open Source Development Lab
> www.osdl.org
> ~                                             
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
> NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
> _______________________________________________
> Lse-tech mailing list
> Lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lse-tech
> 
> 



      parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-28 23:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-28 22:15 [OSDL][BENCHMARK] DBT-2 2.5.65/mjb/osdl comparison data Mary Edie Meredith
2003-03-28 23:25 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-28 23:52   ` [Lse-tech] " Mary Edie Meredith
2003-03-29  1:17     ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-28 23:46 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60870000.1048895207@flay \
    --to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=maryedie@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox