Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor: Move MWAIT quirk out of acpi_processor.c

["Wilczynski, Michal" <michal.wilczynski@intel.com>]

On 8/29/2023 4:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 3:58 PM Wilczynski, Michal
> <michal.wilczynski@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/29/2023 3:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 3:44 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 05:03:29PM +0300, Michal Wilczynski wrote:
>>>>> Commit 2a2a64714d9c ("ACPI: Disable MWAIT via DMI on broken Compal board")
>>>>> introduced a workaround for MWAIT for a specific x86 system.
>>>>>
>>>>> Move the code outside of acpi_processor.c to acpi/x86/ directory for
>>>>> consistency and rename the functions associated with it, so their names
>>>>> start with "acpi_proc_quirk_" to make the goal obvious.
>>>>>
>>>>> No intentional functional impact.
>>>>>
>>>> Except for:
>>>>
>>>> ia64-linux-ld: drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.o: in function `acpi_early_processor_control_setup':
>>>> acpi_processor.c:(.init.text+0x712): undefined reference to `acpi_proc_quirk_mwait_check'
>>>> ia64-linux-ld: drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.o: in function `acpi_early_processor_set_pdc':
>>>> processor_pdc.c:(.init.text+0x72): undefined reference to `acpi_proc_quirk_mwait_check'
>>>>
>>>> which breaks all ia64 builds.
>>>>
>>>> Time to retire that architecture yet ? No one but me seems to even
>>>> build test it.
>>> Including 0-day it seems.  This had been in linux-next for several weeks.
>>>
>>> Michal, can you have a look at this please?
>> Hi,
>> I'll take a look and get back to you with a fix,
> Actually, if I'm not mistaken, the attached patch should be sufficient.

Exactly, adding this empty stub will make sure there is no linker error, this function
is relevant only for x86 anyway.

If ia64 support for 0-day was turned off then I think it was rather recently, cause I've
seen it working I think back in May.

To be honest I'm not sure what is being done in such cases ? Will you send a fix to Linus
directly, or should I prepare a patch and sent in on the list ??

Thanks !
Michał