From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754092AbbIWKaP (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 23 Sep 2015 06:30:15 -0400
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:50821 "EHLO
	mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752854AbbIWKaG (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 23 Sep 2015 06:30:06 -0400
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        "sboyd@codeaurora.org" <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
        "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken big-endian 64bit platforms using 'global_lock'
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:29:42 +0200
Message-ID: <62743134.3NjiZY7jHi@wuerfel>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <56027798.7000700@arm.com>
References: <9b705747a138c96c26faee5218f7b47403195b28.1442305897.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <3821285.7cLYDZsCsX@wuerfel> <56027798.7000700@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:L8AaBA61cgGVRWTKe0m6s5W5H8IStyp4ydN1vGFOl1Fw0EDHwKw
 b5L8LBWsuwfIpT26kNjoeZk8XW9QSQyGviY67aZQAohmqeMzkcZ6Ots7DGFnyEB3kbA0HYv
 fKhNQ2pCnwWJ1k3kYiCHvSKWgGe1vOp0ekOMu6+9ngaPfGfS2wkxBapnBzEGAEJoM8p3BEX
 QSuTAtFpeOq4uXSTIXjXg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:fWUf8PdtWFE=:SddDIonqqVbVVyZaxt99xg
 UI8HaW15iIOctRFdxI7Iqvu3B0c9AvupwOKGWC3etLuKc3SXrnvMo9zRhGVGR4EmbFt8LCDk2
 S/nccmMuzyvzNL+aZjg6EYfGNaOzoxe8Jwy7UgxH19HAFh7dHGf8T8q1IE0VMldkRTxUpyhds
 CvekEz9mBvg3ynsPQtRctTLJPJYj/Yj/+la3/dIS7W8i1gFgm9p5osbGW9ICQ+FKOEKp5q0r/
 2zD7ehcN/PkGwD7eh8RpQmV5V+WBo8/TMBXHSV/KodIlQjIRyaRhXh2w2Kb5qmB+VVBVwPPyo
 3bgdiPBCtgzmrem2awmJkCJ2bT2Ub8Cn965n3Z60ETR+E/K8jsKXXBe3Cq9a6tGamzfR4o6oJ
 BIiPfNxDkPSSsnIMQz0yMsoi4QgPyPBS8O732oVpOHzVbSvl51a7oyaDNQFwyvsfVdKE9qQo7
 oCOswZgAAHOSSeTWDkB+cGooR/YDPk//8KmZzMFpn56kDDvVXABYuSHpZFHOWtUk3AgvzVvKk
 Ugrc5t2KqqXlcBzL1920pNwVt8y8N5NskIkt4/LCHYmPep3EVJvEFK76r24h9erMudrHBWID4
 bemcxq6mAIXa3CQ0VvKne32TAzPBwiPPJw074w60OgMZQQKi8fc3Er8qmucH/VhnnO4aRI+cV
 IEcMcsFigrOYzpc6LU49dxNmjX1V0M/vJ6FWpKfGQH2iNCH4CH8aDHCRMMzq+Ypo+/HNqSL1R
 DOm1q0lAzOdsCAUx
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday 23 September 2015 10:57:44 Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
> Also I am not against the $subject patch as such, just added
> clarification so that it shouldn't be assumed that BE + ACPI works on
> ARM64.
> 

Ok, at least we can safely assume that we do not need to backport that
patch to stable then.

	Arnd