From: Eli Billauer <eli.billauer@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Zheyu Ma <zheyuma97@gmail.com>,
arnd@arndb.de,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] char: xillybus: Check endpoint type before allocing
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 20:05:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <628BBEEB.9010306@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YouxHY48daZt7J/O@kroah.com>
On 23/05/22 19:06, Greg KH wrote:
> If the device does not have the EXACT USB endpoints that you are
> expecting (size, address, direction, type, etc.) at probe time reject
> the device.
>
This is probably a good time to add some information about XillyUSB.
All XillyUSB devices have EP 1 IN and EP 1 OUT as bulk endpoints.
On top of that, they *may* have up to 14 additional bulk OUT endpoints,
having the addresses EP 2 OUT to EP 15 OUT. The population of endpoint
addresses is not necessarily continuous. Any set of OUT endpoint
addresses is allowed. The driver doesn't know which of these endpoints
are available initially.
Rather, it works like this: The driver uses the EP 1 IN and OUT
endpoints to query the device for a data structure, which contains
information on the device's communication channels. The driver sets up
device files accordingly, and it also gets informed on which bulk OUT
endpoints are present.
For what it's worth, I think it's fairly safe to assume that if a device
returns a legal data structure (which passes a CRC test), it's a
XillyUSB device. Either way, it's impossible to verify that all of the
device's bulk OUT endpoints are correct before obtaining the data
structure from the device. The fact that each device has a different set
of communication channels, and that the driver learns about them in
run-time is the whole trick with Xillybus and XillyUSB.
And just in case you wonder why there's only one bulk IN endpoint: All
inbound communication, control as well as data, is multiplexed into this
single endpoint. That's in order to allow the device better control on
which communication channel is serviced at any time, with a few
microseconds' granularity. The same trick is unfortunately infeasible in
the other direction.
I don't have any particular view on how the device should be validated,
but I thought this information would be helpful.
Thanks,
Eli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-23 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-14 7:14 [PATCH] char: xillybus: Check endpoint type properly Zheyu Ma
2022-05-14 7:18 ` Greg KH
2022-05-14 11:48 ` [PATCH v2] char: xillybus: Check endpoint type before allocing Zheyu Ma
2022-05-14 12:52 ` Eli Billauer
2022-05-14 13:24 ` Greg KH
2022-05-14 13:32 ` Greg KH
2022-05-20 3:32 ` Zheyu Ma
2022-05-20 5:41 ` Greg KH
2022-05-22 5:06 ` Zheyu Ma
2022-05-23 16:06 ` Greg KH
2022-05-23 17:05 ` Eli Billauer [this message]
2022-05-23 17:15 ` Greg KH
2022-05-24 12:23 ` Eli Billauer
2022-05-26 12:02 ` Zheyu Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=628BBEEB.9010306@gmail.com \
--to=eli.billauer@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zheyuma97@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox