From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Bug 350] New: i386 context switch very slow compared to 2.4 due to wrmsr (performance)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:35:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <629040000.1045013743@flay> (raw)
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350
Summary: i386 context switch very slow compared to 2.4 due to
wrmsr (performance)
Kernel Version: 2.5.5x (since SYSENTER support went in)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Owner: rml@tech9.net
Submitter: ak@suse.de
Distribution: any
Hardware Environment: especially Intel P4
Software Environment:
Problem Description:
Since the SYSENTER/vsyscall support went in the 2.5 __switch_to/load_esp0
function does two WRMSRs to rewrite MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS and
MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP. This is hidden in processor.h:load_esp0. WRMSR is
very slow (60+ cycles) especially on a Pentium 4 and slows down the context
switch considerably. This is a trade off between faster system calls using
SYSENTER and slower context switches, but the context switches got unduly
hit here.
The reason it rewrites SYSENTER_CS is non obviously vm86 which
doesn't guarantee the MSR stays constant (sigh). I think this would
be better handled by having a global flag or process flag when any process
uses vm86 and not do it when this flag is not set (as in 99% of all
normal use cases)
It rewrites SYSENTER_ESP to the stack page of the current process.
Previous implements used an trampoline for that. The reason it was moved to
the context was that an NMI could see the trampoline stack for one
instruction and when it calls current (very unlikely) and references the
stack pointer it doesn't get a valid task_struct. The obvious solution
would be to somehow check this case (e.g. by looking at esp) in the NMI
slow path.
Steps to reproduce:
Benchmark __switch_to or context switch. Note lmbench is not reliable
(numbers vary wildy); microbenchmarks of WRMSR show the problem clearly.
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-12 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-12 1:35 Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-02-12 2:59 ` [Bug 350] New: i386 context switch very slow compared to 2.4 due to wrmsr (performance) Dave Jones
2003-02-12 4:21 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-02-12 5:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-12 10:12 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-03-10 3:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-10 11:06 ` Andi Kleen
2003-03-10 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-10 22:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-12 12:54 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-12 7:50 ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-12 10:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-02-12 10:45 ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-12 17:52 ` Ingo Oeser
2003-02-12 18:13 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-12 18:18 ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-13 2:42 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-13 5:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-13 18:07 ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-14 0:14 ` [discuss] " Peter Tattam
2003-02-14 1:29 ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-14 1:51 ` Eric Northup
2003-02-14 2:01 ` Peter Tattam
2003-02-14 4:07 ` Thomas J. Merritt
2003-02-14 9:38 ` Peter Finderup Lund
2003-02-14 8:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-03-19 1:22 ` Rob Landley
2003-02-12 4:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-02-12 5:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-12 10:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-02-12 17:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-18 15:24 ` Kevin Pedretti
2003-03-18 16:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-18 18:30 ` Brian Gerst
2003-03-18 19:14 ` Thomas Molina
2003-03-18 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-18 20:03 ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-03-18 20:24 ` Steven Cole
2003-03-19 0:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-19 2:22 ` george anzinger
[not found] <20030318165013$55f4@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030318184010$6448@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-03-18 20:19 ` Pascal Schmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-19 9:55 Ph. Marek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=629040000.1045013743@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox