From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 'perf mem record' on a Intel hybrid system broken
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 15:13:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62e4deb4-77ee-4937-8959-69de462f4d8e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z1nee9PakNKG_mL3@google.com>
On 2024-12-11 1:48 p.m., Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 12:55:03PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>> On 2024-12-04 2:24 p.m., Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>> I think I got a related report from the kernel test robot but it was a
>>> Sapphire Rapids machine. I don't have a Intel hybrid machine in hand.
>>> I'll try to take a look at it on Sapphire Rapids.
>>
>> The default precise_ip level for perf mem is always 3.
>>
>> For the latest intel platforms, it implies PDist, which is only
>> available on GP 0.
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c#n4412
>>
>> However, the mem-load PEBS event is available on all GP counters but GP
>> 0. :(
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c#n1176
>>
>> So the precise_ip-- is required.
>>
>> The failure of scheduling returns -EINVAL.
>>
>> But Namhyung's patch assumes that the kernel return -EOPNOTSUPP when PMU
>> doesn't support the given precise level.
>> (Sorry, I didn't notice the case early.)
>>
>> Is it possible to reduce the precise_ip for the -EINVAL as well?
>
> Sure, please see https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z1DV0lN8qHSysX7f@google.com
>
Thanks for the fix. It looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Kan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-11 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-04 17:45 [REGRESSION] 'perf mem record' on a Intel hybrid system broken Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-12-04 19:24 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-12-11 17:55 ` Liang, Kan
2024-12-11 18:48 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-12-11 20:13 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62e4deb4-77ee-4937-8959-69de462f4d8e@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox