From: Ed Cashin <ecashin@coraid.com>
To: bonbons@linux-vserver.org, ecashin@coraid.com, apw@canonical.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] aoe: ensure we initialise the request_queue correctly
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:15:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6309cc7d77486e24aca5130ec5802dfb@coraid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090829154305.723fd86c@neptune.home>
On Sat Aug 29 09:43:54 EDT 2009, bonbons@linux-vserver.org wrote:
...
> I finished bisecting the NULL object and ended up at this commit:
> cd43e26f071524647e660706b784ebcbefbd2e44
>
> block: Expose stacked device queues in sysfs
>
> Currently stacking devices do not have a queue directory in sysfs.
> However, many of the I/O characteristics like sector size, maximum
> request size, etc. are queue properties.
>
> This patch enables the queue directory for MD/DM devices. The elevator
> code has been modified to deal with queues that do not have an I/O
> scheduler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
>
>
> This seems to generate /sys/block/$device/queue and its contents for
> everyone who is using queues, not just for those queues that have a
> non-NULL queue->request_fn.
Thanks much for doing that. It makes sense that this change would
have caused it to suddenly matter whether the unused queue is
initialized.
The patch looks fine to me.
I don't think it should go in my aoe tree for linux-next, since the
patch addresses a regression.
Based on the series file in mmotm, I don't think this patch is in mm
at the moment. Andrew Morton, do you think this patch should go
through your mm tree?
--
Ed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-01 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-21 16:41 [PATCH 0/1] aoe: ensure we initialise the request_queue correctly Andy Whitcroft
2009-08-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Andy Whitcroft
2009-08-21 18:58 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Ed Cashin
2009-08-22 9:21 ` Bruno Prémont
2009-08-22 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-23 9:00 ` Bruno Prémont
2009-08-23 20:16 ` Bruno Prémont
2009-08-24 14:27 ` Ed Cashin
2009-08-29 13:43 ` Bruno Prémont
2009-09-01 19:15 ` Ed Cashin [this message]
2009-09-01 20:31 ` Bruno Prémont
2009-09-02 13:31 ` Ed Cashin
2009-09-02 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-02 20:16 ` Ed Cashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6309cc7d77486e24aca5130ec5802dfb@coraid.com \
--to=ecashin@coraid.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=bonbons@linux-vserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox