public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ed Cashin <ecashin@coraid.com>
To: bonbons@linux-vserver.org, ecashin@coraid.com, apw@canonical.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] aoe: ensure we initialise the request_queue correctly
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:15:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6309cc7d77486e24aca5130ec5802dfb@coraid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090829154305.723fd86c@neptune.home>

On Sat Aug 29 09:43:54 EDT 2009, bonbons@linux-vserver.org wrote:
...
> I finished bisecting the NULL object and ended up at this commit:
>   cd43e26f071524647e660706b784ebcbefbd2e44
> 
>   block: Expose stacked device queues in sysfs
> 
>   Currently stacking devices do not have a queue directory in sysfs.
>   However, many of the I/O characteristics like sector size, maximum
>   request size, etc. are queue properties.
> 
>   This patch enables the queue directory for MD/DM devices.  The elevator
>   code has been modified to deal with queues that do not have an I/O
>   scheduler.
> 
>   Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
>   Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> 
> 
> This seems to generate /sys/block/$device/queue and its contents for
> everyone who is using queues, not just for those queues that have a
> non-NULL queue->request_fn.

Thanks much for doing that.  It makes sense that this change would
have caused it to suddenly matter whether the unused queue is
initialized.

The patch looks fine to me.

I don't think it should go in my aoe tree for linux-next, since the
patch addresses a regression.

Based on the series file in mmotm, I don't think this patch is in mm
at the moment.  Andrew Morton, do you think this patch should go
through your mm tree?

-- 
  Ed

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-01 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-21 16:41 [PATCH 0/1] aoe: ensure we initialise the request_queue correctly Andy Whitcroft
2009-08-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Andy Whitcroft
2009-08-21 18:58 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Ed Cashin
2009-08-22  9:21 ` Bruno Prémont
2009-08-22 21:52   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-23  9:00     ` Bruno Prémont
2009-08-23 20:16       ` Bruno Prémont
2009-08-24 14:27 ` Ed Cashin
2009-08-29 13:43   ` Bruno Prémont
2009-09-01 19:15     ` Ed Cashin [this message]
2009-09-01 20:31       ` Bruno Prémont
2009-09-02 13:31         ` Ed Cashin
2009-09-02 19:55       ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-02 20:16         ` Ed Cashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6309cc7d77486e24aca5130ec5802dfb@coraid.com \
    --to=ecashin@coraid.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=bonbons@linux-vserver.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox