From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: carlos <carlos@redhat.com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ben Maurer <bmaurer@fb.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH glibc 1/4] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C startup and thread creation (v6)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:57:39 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <632671842.3079.1548781059601.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190121213530.23803-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
----- On Jan 21, 2019, at 4:35 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sys/rseq.h
> b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sys/rseq.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..61937fb193
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sys/rseq.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
[...]
> +
> +#ifndef _SYS_RSEQ_H
> +#define _SYS_RSEQ_H 1
> +
> +/* We use the structures declarations from the kernel headers. */
> +#include <linux/rseq.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +
> +/* Signature required before each abort handler code. */
> +#define RSEQ_SIG 0x53053053
I recalled that aarch64 defines RSEQ_SIG to a different value which maps to
a valid trap instruction. So I plan to move the RSEQ_SIG define to per-arch
headers like this:
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/bits/rseq.h | 24 ++
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/bits/rseq.h | 24 ++
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bits/rseq.h | 23 ++
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/bits/rseq.h | 24 ++
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/bits/rseq.h | 24 ++
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/bits/rseq.h | 24 ++
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/bits/rseq.h | 24 ++
where "bits/rseq.h" contains a #error:
# error "Architecture does not define RSEQ_SIG.
sys/rseq.h will now include <bits/rseq.h>.
> +
> +enum rseq_register_state
> +{
> + /* Value RSEQ_REGISTER_ALLOWED means it is allowed to update
> + the refcount field and to register/unregister rseq. */
> + RSEQ_REGISTER_ALLOWED = 0,
> + /* Value RSEQ_REGISTER_NESTED means it is temporarily forbidden
> + to update the refcount field or to register/unregister rseq. */
> + RSEQ_REGISTER_NESTED = 1,
I plan to rename "RSEQ_REGISTER_NESTED" to "RSEQ_REGISTER_ONGOING" which
seems to better represent the current registration state.
Please let me know if anything is wrong with those changes.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> + /* Value RSEQ_REGISTER_EXITING means it is forbidden to update the
> + refcount field or to register/unregister rseq for the rest of the
> + thread's lifetime. */
> + RSEQ_REGISTER_EXITING = 2,
> +};
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-29 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-21 21:35 [RFC PATCH glibc 1/4] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C startup and thread creation (v6) Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-01-21 21:35 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 2/4] glibc: sched_getcpu(): use rseq cpu_id TLS on Linux Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-01-29 16:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2019-01-29 21:56 ` [RFC PATCH glibc 1/4] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C startup and thread creation (v6) Joseph Myers
2019-01-30 1:39 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-01-30 2:40 ` Joseph Myers
2019-01-30 18:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-01-30 21:10 ` Joseph Myers
2019-01-31 16:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-01-31 16:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=632671842.3079.1548781059601.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=bmaurer@fb.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox