The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@outlook.com>,
	Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>,
	Tingyin Duan <tingyin.duan@gmail.com>,
	Vern Hao <vernhao@tencent.com>, Vern Hao <haoxing990@gmail.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>,
	Adam Li <adamli@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
	Gavin Guo <gavinguo@igalia.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
	Libo Chen <libchen@purestorage.com>,
	Luo Gengkun <luogengkun2@huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Patch v4 13/16] sched/cache: Fix cache aware scheduling enabling for multi LLCs system
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 13:39:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6328a8a7f40925cec2a712d81ee58128a4c4444a.1778703694.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1778703694.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>

From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>

If there are multiple LLCs in the system, cache aware scheduling
should be enabled. However, there is a corner case where, if there
is a single NUMA node and a single LLC per node, cache aware
scheduling will be turned on in the current implementation -
because at this moment, the parent domain has not yet been
degenerated, and it is possible that the current domain has the
same cpu span as its parent. There is no need to turn cache aware
scheduling on in this scenario.

Fix it by iterating the parent domains to find a domain that is
a superset of the current sd_llc, so that later, after the duplicated
parent domains have been degenerated, cache aware scheduling will
take effect.

For example, the expected behavior would be:
2 sockets, 1 LLC per socket: MC span=0-3, PKG span=0-7, has_multi_llcs=true
1 socket, 2 LLCs per socket: MC span=0-3, PKG span=0-7, has_multi_llcs=true
2 sockets, 2 LLCs per socket: MC span=0-3, PKG span=0-7, has_multi_llcs=true
1 socket, 1 LLC per socket: MC span=0-3, PKG span=0-3, has_multi_llcs=false

This bug was reported by sashiko.

Fixes: d59f4fd1d303 ("sched/cache: Enable cache aware scheduling for
multi LLCs NUMA node")
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
---
 kernel/sched/topology.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index cff5a0ecd64d..07f0a3d28253 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1007,6 +1007,37 @@ static bool alloc_sd_llc(const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
 }
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * Return true if @sd belongs to an LLC group whose enclosing
+ * partition spans more than one LLC. @sd must be the topmost
+ * SD_SHARE_LLC domain.
+ *
+ * Any duplicated parent domains with the same span as @sd are
+ * skipped: before cpu_attach_domain() degeneration these still
+ * exist, after degeneration the loop is a no-op. This makes the
+ * helper usable both during sched domain build and against an
+ * already-attached domain tree.
+ *
+ * Note: For systems with a single LLC per node, cache-aware
+ * scheduling is still enabled when multiple nodes exist.
+ * However, NUMA balancing decisions take precedence over
+ * cache-aware scheduling. Conversely, if there is only one
+ * LLC per partition, cache-aware scheduling should be disabled.
+ */
+static bool sd_in_multi_llcs(struct sched_domain *sd)
+{
+	struct sched_domain *sdp = sd->parent;
+
+	/* it does not make sense to aggregate to 1 CPU */
+	if (sd->span_weight == 1)
+		return false;
+
+	while (sdp && sdp->span_weight == sd->span_weight)
+		sdp = sdp->parent;
+
+	return !!sdp;
+}
+
 /*
  * Return the canonical balance CPU for this group, this is the first CPU
  * of this group that's also in the balance mask.
@@ -3016,9 +3047,11 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
 			 * NUMA imbalance stats for the hierarchy.
 			 */
 			if (sd->parent) {
-			    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA))
-				    adjust_numa_imbalance(sd);
-			    has_multi_llcs = true;
+				if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA))
+					adjust_numa_imbalance(sd);
+
+				if (sd_in_multi_llcs(sd))
+					has_multi_llcs = true;
 			}
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.32.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-13 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-13 20:39 [Patch v4 00/16] Cache aware scheduling enhancements Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 01/16] sched/cache: Allow only 1 thread of the process to calculate the LLC occupancy Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 02/16] sched/cache: Disable cache aware scheduling for processes with high thread counts Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 03/16] sched/cache: Skip cache-aware scheduling for single-threaded processes Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 04/16] sched/cache: Calculate the LLC size and store it in sched_domain Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 05/16] sched/cache: Avoid cache-aware scheduling for memory-heavy processes Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 06/16] sched/cache: Add user control to adjust the aggressiveness of cache-aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 07/16] sched/cache: Fix rcu warning when accessing sd_llc domain Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 08/16] sched/cache: Fix potential NULL mm pointer access Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 09/16] sched/cache: Annotate lockless accesses to mm->sc_stat.cpu Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 10/16] sched/cache: Fix unpaired account_llc_enqueue/dequeue Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 11/16] sched/cache: Fix checking active load balance by only considering the CFS task Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 12/16] sched/cache: Fix race condition during sched domain rebuild Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 14/16] sched/cache: Fix has_multi_llcs iff at least one partition has multiple LLCs Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 15/16] sched/cache: Fix possible overflow when invalidating the preferred CPU Tim Chen
2026-05-13 20:39 ` [Patch v4 16/16] sched/cache: Fix stale preferred_llc for a new task Tim Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6328a8a7f40925cec2a712d81ee58128a4c4444a.1778703694.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=adamli@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cyy@cyyself.name \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gavinguo@igalia.com \
    --cc=haoxing990@gmail.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
    --cc=joshdon@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=libchen@purestorage.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luogengkun2@huawei.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=tingyin.duan@gmail.com \
    --cc=vernhao@tencent.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox