From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 May 2001 02:42:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 May 2001 02:41:52 -0400 Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:35062 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 21 May 2001 02:41:41 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <20010520211346.A6170@thyrsus.com> In-Reply-To: <20010520211346.A6170@thyrsus.com> <8485.990357599@redhat.com> <20010520111856.C3431@thyrsus.com> <15823.990372866@redhat.com> <20010520114411.A3600@thyrsus.com> <16267.990374170@redhat.com> <20010520131457.A3769@thyrsus.com> <18686.990380851@redhat.com> <20010520164700.H4488@thyrsus.com> <20010520165952.A9622@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <25499.990399116@redhat.com> To: esr@thyrsus.com Cc: Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosophy Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 07:41:37 +0100 Message-ID: <6382.990427297@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org esr@thyrsus.com said: > What discussion is that? Unless Linus has changed his mind and I > don't know about it, CML2 is going in between 2.5.1 and 2.5.2. Because it is evidently confusing the issue. Perhaps because it sounds like you were intending to feed Linus large patches for 2.5.[12] which effect _both_ changes. Have patience - let the less contentious part of CML2 go in first, and then we can deal with the other stuff later, once CML2 has been accepted (however grudgingly in some cases) by developers. > The engine is working. Why is it not yet time to discuss ruleset design > and modes? For a man who claims to hack social systems, that's an incredibly naïve question. -- dwmw2