From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: zwisler@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: use canonical ftrace path
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 22:27:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <641005c453661_4258120826@john.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230313204050.GA592900@google.com>
Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 06:33:52PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:52:09 -0700
> > zwisler@kernel.org wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c
> > > index 156743cf5870..4fa61ac8a0ee 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/get_cgroup_id_user.c
> > > @@ -86,8 +86,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > > pid = getpid();
> > > bpf_map_update_elem(pidmap_fd, &key, &pid, 0);
> > >
> > > - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > > - "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> > > + if (access("/sys/kernel/tracing/trace", F_OK) == 0)
> > > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > > + "/sys/kernel/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> > > + else
> > > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > > + "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> >
> > I don't know how the BPF folks feel, but I do know some kernel developers
> > prefer that if you need to break a single command into multiple lines that
> > you then need to add brackets around it. As it makes it easier to read.
> >
> > if (access("/sys/kernel/tracing/trace", F_OK) == 0) {
> > snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > "/sys/kernel/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> > } else {
> > snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > > efd = open(buf, O_RDONLY, 0);
> > > if (CHECK(efd < 0, "open", "err %d errno %d\n", efd, errno))
> > > goto close_prog;
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> > > index 113dba349a57..22be0a9a5a0a 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> > > @@ -338,7 +338,12 @@ static int get_syms(char ***symsp, size_t *cntp, bool kernel)
> > > * Filtering out duplicates by using hashmap__add, which won't
> > > * add existing entry.
> > > */
> > > - f = fopen("/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/available_filter_functions", "r");
> > > +
> > > + if (access("/sys/kernel/tracing/trace", F_OK) == 0)
> > > + f = fopen("/sys/kernel/tracing/available_filter_functions", "r");
> > > + else
> > > + f = fopen("/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/available_filter_functions", "r");
> > > +
> > > if (!f)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_fd_query_tp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_fd_query_tp.c
> > > index c717741bf8b6..60f92fd3c37a 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_fd_query_tp.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_fd_query_tp.c
> > > @@ -17,8 +17,12 @@ static void test_task_fd_query_tp_core(const char *probe_name,
> > > if (CHECK(err, "bpf_prog_test_load", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
> > > goto close_prog;
> > >
> > > - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > > - "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> > > + if (access("/sys/kernel/tracing/trace", F_OK) == 0)
> > > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > > + "/sys/kernel/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> > > + else
> > > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > > + "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/%s/id", probe_name);
> >
> > Same here.
> >
> > > efd = open(buf, O_RDONLY, 0);
> > > if (CHECK(efd < 0, "open", "err %d errno %d\n", efd, errno))
> > > goto close_prog;
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c
> > > index 770fcc3bb1ba..d3e377fa8e9b 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c
> > > @@ -16,8 +16,12 @@ void serial_test_tp_attach_query(void)
> > > for (i = 0; i < num_progs; i++)
> > > obj[i] = NULL;
> > >
> > > - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > > - "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_switch/id");
> > > + if (access("/sys/kernel/tracing/trace", F_OK) == 0)
> > > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > > + "/sys/kernel/tracing/events/sched/sched_switch/id");
> > > + else
> > > + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
> > > + "/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_switch/id");
> >
> > and here.
> >
> > But perhaps the BPF folks don't care?
>
> Sure, I agree that this is more readable. I'll gather your Reviewed-by for
> patch #1, make this change, rebase to the current bpf/bpf-next and send out
> v4.
Also for the patch. LGTM
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-14 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-10 17:52 [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: use canonical ftrace path zwisler
2023-03-10 17:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: " zwisler
2023-03-10 23:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-03-13 20:40 ` Ross Zwisler
2023-03-14 5:27 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2023-03-10 23:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: " Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=641005c453661_4258120826@john.notmuch \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=zwisler@google.com \
--cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox