From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sched: Create architecture specific sched domain distances
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:30:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6446b46bb8750deb28687b3e84d9b6062a35c86a.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79db86a1-dc75-42ca-9cff-927539dc2104@intel.com>
On Tue, 2025-09-30 at 10:28 +0800, Chen, Yu C wrote:
> On 9/30/2025 6:18 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
> > On Sat, 2025-09-27 at 20:34 +0800, Chen, Yu C wrote:
> > >
[snip]
> > >
> > > If our goal is to figure out whether the arch_sched_node_distance()
> > > has been overridden, how about the following alias?
> > >
> > > int __weak arch_sched_node_distance(int from, int to)
> > > {
> > > return __node_distance(from, to);
> > > }
> > > int arch_sched_node_distance_original(int from, int to) __weak
> > > __alias(arch_sched_node_distance);
> > >
> > > static bool arch_sched_node_distance_is_overridden(void)
> > > {
> > > return arch_sched_node_distance != arch_sched_node_distance_original;
> > > }
> > >
> > > so arch_sched_node_distance_is_overridden() can replace
> > > modified_sched_node_distance()
> > >
> >
> > I think that the alias version will still point to the replaced function and not
> > the originally defined one.
> >
> > How about not using __weak and just explicitly define arch_sched_node_distance
> > as a function pointer. Change the code like below.
> >
>
> The arch_sched_node_distance_original is defined as __weak, so it
> should point to the old function even if the function has been
> overridden. I did a test on a X86 VM and it seems to be so.
> But using the arch_sched_node_distance as a function point
> should also be OK.
>
How about changing the code as follow. I think this change is cleaner.
I tested it in my VM and works for detecting sched distance substitution.
Thanks.
Tim
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index f25e4402c63e..3dc941258df3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1897,31 +1897,17 @@ static void init_numa_topology_type(int offline_node)
* A NUMA level is created for each unique
* arch_sched_node_distance.
*/
-static bool __modified_sched_node_dist = true;
-
-int __weak arch_sched_node_distance(int from, int to)
+static int numa_node_dist(int i, int j)
{
- if (__modified_sched_node_dist)
- __modified_sched_node_dist = false;
-
- return node_distance(from, to);
+ return node_distance(i, j);
}
-static bool modified_sched_node_distance(void)
-{
- /*
- * Call arch_sched_node_distance()
- * to determine if arch_sched_node_distance
- * has been modified from node_distance()
- * to arch specific distance.
- */
- arch_sched_node_distance(0, 0);
- return __modified_sched_node_dist;
-}
+int arch_sched_node_distance(int from, int to)
+ __weak __alias(numa_node_dist);
-static int numa_node_dist(int i, int j)
+static bool modified_sched_node_distance(void)
{
- return node_distance(i, j);
+ return numa_node_dist != arch_sched_node_distance;
}
static int sched_record_numa_dist(int offline_node, int (*n_dist)(int, int),
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-30 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-19 17:50 [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix NUMA sched domain build errors for GNR and CWF Tim Chen
2025-09-19 17:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] sched: Create architecture specific sched domain distances Tim Chen
2025-09-27 12:34 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-09-29 22:18 ` Tim Chen
2025-09-30 2:28 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-09-30 17:30 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2025-10-01 1:10 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-09-19 17:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] sched/topology: Fix sched domain build error for GNR, CWF in SNC-3 mode Tim Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6446b46bb8750deb28687b3e84d9b6062a35c86a.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox