From: "Liang He" <windhl@126.com>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] memory/tegra: Add missing of_node_get() in tegra_emc_find_node_by_ram_code
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:20:33 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <646ff210.68cc.1818ab69fb3.Coremail.windhl@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3a0b35e-33fc-f7f3-a111-1a88498b4019@linaro.org>
At 2022-06-22 17:08:32, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>On 22/06/2022 10:49, Liang He wrote:
>>
>>
>> At 2022-06-22 16:41:28, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On 22/06/2022 06:28, Liang He wrote:
>>>> of_find_node_by_name() will decrease the refcount of its first arg and
>>>> we need to add a of_node_put() to keep refcount balance.
>>>>
>>>> Besides, during the 'for' loop execution, the refcount of 'np' will be
>>>> automatically increased and decreased. There is no need to call
>>>> of_node_put() again.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@126.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c | 3 ++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> The patch was not even compiled... I consider it harmful approach. NAK.
>>> See: https://lwn.net/Articles/854645/
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>
>> Sorry, Krzysztof.
>>
>> As the patch is so simple two lines , I thought I can handle it without compiling it.
>>
>> Thanks very much for your notice about the article and I hope I have not done anyother harmful things.
>>
>> And I will take care of my patch code in future no matter how simple it is.
>
>
>Never send patches which were not built. It seems you didn't build them
>in the past either, even though setting up cross compile is trivial (few
>commands). QEMU is also an easy option.
>
>Even though your contribution might be valuable, lack of building is a
>sign for me that approach is not serious, so I am not going to take
>risky code.
>
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof
Thanks, Krzysztof.
This a valuable lesson for me.
Last few days, I just want to report the bugs as quickly as I can.
And I only focus the bugs I found but not the patch compiling problem.
Yes, I admit this approach (way) is not serious and this is my fault, sorry again and sorry to waste your time.
From now on, I will not send any new patch commit before I compile the patch code.
Sorry for my behavior.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 4:28 [PATCH] memory/tegra: Add missing of_node_get() in tegra_emc_find_node_by_ram_code Liang He
2022-06-22 6:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-06-22 6:56 ` Liang He
2022-06-22 8:35 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-22 8:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-06-22 8:49 ` Liang He
2022-06-22 9:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-06-22 9:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-06-22 9:20 ` Liang He [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=646ff210.68cc.1818ab69fb3.Coremail.windhl@126.com \
--to=windhl@126.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox