public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@intel.com>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Liu, Zhao1" <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kang, Shan" <shan.kang@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 8/9] KVM: VMX: Open code VMX preemption timer rate mask in its accessor
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:05:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64cc46778ccc93e28ec8d39b3b4e31842154f382.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZilmVN0gbFlpnHO9@google.com>

On Wed, 2024-04-24 at 13:06 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2024, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> > > On 3/16/2024 1:54 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024, Zhao Liu wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 05:27:24PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > > > Use vmx_misc_preemption_timer_rate() to get the rate in hardware_setup(),
> > > > > > and open code the rate's bitmask in vmx_misc_preemption_timer_rate() so
> > > > > > that the function looks like all the helpers that grab values from
> > > > > > VMX_BASIC and VMX_MISC MSR values.
> > > > 
> > > > ...
> > > > 
> > > > > > -#define VMX_MISC_PREEMPTION_TIMER_RATE_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(4, 0)
> > > > > >   #define VMX_MISC_SAVE_EFER_LMA			BIT_ULL(5)
> > > > > >   #define VMX_MISC_ACTIVITY_HLT			BIT_ULL(6)
> > > > > >   #define VMX_MISC_ACTIVITY_SHUTDOWN		BIT_ULL(7)
> > > > > > @@ -162,7 +161,7 @@ static inline u32 vmx_basic_vmcs_mem_type(u64 vmx_basic)
> > > > > >   static inline int vmx_misc_preemption_timer_rate(u64 vmx_misc)
> > > > > >   {
> > > > > > -	return vmx_misc & VMX_MISC_PREEMPTION_TIMER_RATE_MASK;
> > > > > > +	return vmx_misc & GENMASK_ULL(4, 0);
> > > > > >   }
> > > > > 
> > > > > I feel keeping VMX_MISC_PREEMPTION_TIMER_RATE_MASK is clearer than
> > > > > GENMASK_ULL(4, 0), and the former improves code readability.
> > > > > 
> > > > > May not need to drop VMX_MISC_PREEMPTION_TIMER_RATE_MASK?
> > > > 
> > > > I don't necessarily disagree, but in this case I value consistency over one
> > > > individual case.  As called out in the changelog, the motivation is to make
> > > > vmx_misc_preemption_timer_rate() look like all the surrounding helpers.
> > > > 
> > > > _If_ we want to preserve the mask, then we should add #defines for vmx_misc_cr3_count(),
> > > > vmx_misc_max_msr(), etc.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't have a super strong preference, though I think my vote would be to not
> > > > add the masks and go with this patch.  These helpers are intended to be the _only_
> > > > way to access the fields, i.e. they effectively _are_ the mask macros, just in
> > > > function form.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > +1.
> > > 
> > > However, it seems different for vmx_basic_vmcs_mem_type() in patch 5, that I
> > > just recommended to define the MASK.
> > > 
> > > Because we already have
> > > 
> > > 	#define VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_SHIFT	50
> > > 
> > > and it has been used in vmx/nested.c,
> > > 
> > > static inline u32 vmx_basic_vmcs_mem_type(u64 vmx_basic)
> > > {
> > > 	return (vmx_basic & GENMASK_ULL(53, 50)) >>
> > > 		VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_SHIFT;
> > > }
> > > 
> > > looks not intuitive than original patch.
> > 
> > Yeah, agreed, that's taking the worst of both worlds.  I'll update patch 5 to drop
> > VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_SHIFT when effectively "moving" it into vmx_basic_vmcs_mem_type().
> 
> Drat.  Finally getting back to this, dropping VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_SHIFT doesn't
> work because it's used by nested_vmx_setup_basic(), as is VMX_BASIC_VMCS_SIZE_SHIFT,
> which is presumably why past me kept them around.
> 
> I'm leaning towards keeping things as proposed in this series.  I don't see us
> gaining a third copy, or even a third user, i.e. I don't think we are creating a
> future problem by open coding the shift in vmx_basic_vmcs_mem_type().  And IMO
> code like this
> 
> 	return (vmx_basic & VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_MASK) >>
> 	       VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_SHIFT;
> 
> is an unnecessary obfuscation when there is literally one user (the accessor).
> 
> Another idea would be to delete VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_SHIFT and VMX_BASIC_VMCS_SIZE_SHIFT,
> and either open code the values or use local const variables, but that also seems
> like a net negative, e.g. splits the effective definitions over too many locations.

Alternatively, we can add macros like below to <asm/vmx.h> close to
vmx_basic_vmcs_size() etc, so it's straightforward to see.

+#define VMX_BSAIC_VMCS12_SIZE	((u64)VMCS12_SIZE << 32)
+#define VMX_BASIC_MEM_TYPE_WB	(MEM_TYPE_WB << 50)

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-25 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-09  1:27 [PATCH v6 0/9] x86/cpu: KVM: Clean up PAT and VMX macros Sean Christopherson
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] x86/cpu: KVM: Add common defines for architectural memory types (PAT, MTRRs, etc.) Sean Christopherson
2024-03-27 11:13   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-03 18:57     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-03 21:17       ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-03 21:42         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] x86/cpu: KVM: Move macro to encode PAT value to common header Sean Christopherson
2024-03-27 11:21   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-01  5:28   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-04-03 21:03   ` Huang, Kai
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] KVM: x86: Stuff vCPU's PAT with default value at RESET, not creation Sean Christopherson
2024-03-27 11:22   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-01  6:00   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] KVM: VMX: Move MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC bit defines to asm/vmx.h Sean Christopherson
2024-03-15 15:13   ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-27 10:37   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-01  6:13   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-04-02  5:01     ` Li, Xin3
2024-04-02 14:28       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] KVM: VMX: Track CPU's MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC as a single 64-bit value Sean Christopherson
2024-03-15 15:26   ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-27 10:38   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-01  6:27   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] KVM: nVMX: Use macros and #defines in vmx_restore_vmx_basic() Sean Christopherson
2024-03-15 15:30   ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-27 10:53   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-01  7:00   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] KVM VMX: Move MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC bit defines to asm/vmx.h Sean Christopherson
2024-03-15 15:43   ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-27 10:55   ` Huang, Kai
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] KVM: VMX: Open code VMX preemption timer rate mask in its accessor Sean Christopherson
2024-03-15 15:46   ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-15 17:54     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-01  7:07       ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-04-02 22:06         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-24 20:06           ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 10:05             ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2024-04-25 14:42               ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 21:44                 ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-25 14:18             ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-27 10:59   ` Huang, Kai
2024-03-09  1:27 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] KVM: nVMX: Use macros and #defines in vmx_restore_vmx_misc() Sean Christopherson
2024-03-15 15:52   ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-27 11:02   ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-01  7:09   ` Xiaoyao Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=64cc46778ccc93e28ec8d39b3b4e31842154f382.camel@intel.com \
    --to=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shan.kang@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox