public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita" <skoralah@amd.com>
To: "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>,
	Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
	"linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>,
	Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>,
	Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Ying Huang <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>,
	"Xingtao Yao (Fujitsu)" <yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@amd.com>,
	Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>,
	Benjamin Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@amd.com>,
	PradeepVineshReddy Kodamati <PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] cxl/region, dax/hmem: Guard CXL DAX region creation and tighten HMEM deps
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 21:06:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <652a4391-4825-46bf-9f64-52e0ef751dff@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2397ebb5-ae63-402e-bc23-339c74be9210@fujitsu.com>

On 8/31/2025 11:21 PM, Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 22/08/2025 11:42, Smita Koralahalli wrote:
>> Prevent cxl_region_probe() from unconditionally calling into
>> devm_cxl_add_dax_region() when the DEV_DAX_CXL driver is not enabled.
>> Wrap the call with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_DAX_CXL) so region probe skips
>> DAX setup cleanly if no consumer is present.
> 
> A question came to mind:
>    
> Why is the case of `CXL_REGION && !DEV_DAX_CXL` necessary? It appears to fall back to the hmem driver in that scenario.
> If so, could we instead simplify it as follows?
>    
> --- a/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/Kconfig
> @@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ config CXL_REGION
>           depends on SPARSEMEM
>           select MEMREGION
>           select GET_FREE_REGION
> +       select DEV_DAX_CXL
> 

I’m not entirely sure about the full implications of disabling 
CXL_REGION when DEV_DAX_CXL is disabled.

The primary intent of this patch was to address the scenario where 
DEV_DAX_HMEM=y and CXL=m, which results in DEV_DAX_CXL being disabled. 
In that configuration, ownership of the soft-reserved ranges incorrectly 
falls back to hmem instead of being managed by CXL. This leads to 
misleading output in /proc/iomem, as I illustrated earlier.

That said, as you pointed out, dax_hmem is not exclusive to CXL, so I 
will drop this patch in v2. The next revision will therefore not cover 
the case of DEV_DAX_HMEM=y and CXL=m. I would appreciate input on how 
best to handle this scenario efficiently.

Thanks
Smita

>>
>> In parallel, update DEV_DAX_HMEM’s Kconfig to depend on
>> !CXL_BUS || (CXL_ACPI && CXL_PCI) || m. This ensures:
>>
>> Built-in (y) HMEM is allowed when CXL is disabled, or when the full
>> CXL discovery stack is built-in. Module (m) HMEM remains always possible.
> 
> Hmm,IIUC, `dax_hmem` isn't exclusively designed for CXL. It could support other special memory types (e.g., HBM).
> 
> Thanks
> Zhijian
> 
> 
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
>> ---
>> I did not want to override Dan’s original approach, so I am posting this
>> as an RFC.
>>
>> This patch addresses a corner case when applied on top of Patches 1–5.
>>
>> When DEV_DAX_HMEM=y and CXL=m, the DEV_DAX_CXL option ends up disabled.
>> In that configuration, with Patches 1–5 applied, ownership of the Soft
>> Reserved ranges falls back to dax_hmem. As a result, /proc/iomem looks
>> like this:
>>
>> 850000000-284fffffff : CXL Window 0
>>     850000000-284fffffff : region3
>>       850000000-284fffffff : Soft Reserved
>>         850000000-284fffffff : dax0.0
>>           850000000-284fffffff : System RAM (kmem)
>> 2850000000-484fffffff : CXL Window 1
>>     2850000000-484fffffff : region4
>>       2850000000-484fffffff : Soft Reserved
>>         2850000000-484fffffff : dax1.0
>>           2850000000-484fffffff : System RAM (kmem)
>> 4850000000-684fffffff : CXL Window 2
>>     4850000000-684fffffff : region5
>>       4850000000-684fffffff : Soft Reserved
>>         4850000000-684fffffff : dax2.0
>>           4850000000-684fffffff : System RAM (kmem)
>>
>> In this case the dax devices are created by dax_hmem, not by dax_cxl.
>> Consequently, a "cxl disable-region <regionx>" operation does not
>> unregister these devices. In addition, the dmesg output can be misleading
>> to users, since it looks like the CXL region driver created the devdax
>> devices:
>>
>>     devm_cxl_add_region: cxl_acpi ACPI0017:00: decoder0.2: created region5
>>     ..
>>     ..
>>
>> This patch addresses those situations. I am not entirely sure how clean
>> the approach of using “|| m” is, so I am sending it as RFC for feedback.
>> ---
>>    drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 4 +++-
>>    drivers/dax/Kconfig       | 1 +
>>    2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> index 71cc42d05248..6a2c21e55dbc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> @@ -3617,7 +3617,9 @@ static int cxl_region_probe(struct device *dev)
>>    					p->res->start, p->res->end, cxlr,
>>    					is_system_ram) > 0)
>>    			return 0;
>> -		return devm_cxl_add_dax_region(cxlr);
>> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_DAX_CXL))
>> +			return devm_cxl_add_dax_region(cxlr);
>> +		return 0;
>>    	default:
>>    		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "unsupported region mode: %d\n",
>>    			cxlr->mode);
>> diff --git a/drivers/dax/Kconfig b/drivers/dax/Kconfig
>> index 3683bb3f2311..fd12cca91c78 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dax/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/dax/Kconfig
>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ config DEV_DAX_PMEM
>>    config DEV_DAX_HMEM
>>    	tristate "HMEM DAX: direct access to 'specific purpose' memory"
>>    	depends on EFI_SOFT_RESERVE
>> +	depends on !CXL_BUS || (CXL_ACPI && CXL_PCI) || m
>>    	select NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO if NUMA_MEMBLKS
>>    	default DEV_DAX
>>    	help


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-30  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-22  3:41 [PATCH 0/6] dax/hmem, cxl: Coordinate Soft Reserved handling with CXL Smita Koralahalli
2025-08-22  3:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] dax/hmem, e820, resource: Defer Soft Reserved registration until hmem is ready Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01  2:59   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-09-30  4:01     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-09-08 23:01   ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-11 19:39     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-09-25 18:17       ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-09 16:12   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-30  4:56     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-12-18 17:52     ` dan.j.williams
2026-01-13 18:29       ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-22  3:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] dax/hmem: Request cxl_acpi and cxl_pci before walking Soft Reserved ranges Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01  3:08   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-09-04 17:35   ` Dave Jiang
2025-08-22  3:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] dax/hmem, cxl: Tighten dependencies on DEV_DAX_CXL and dax_hmem Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01  3:28   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-09-30  4:04     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-08-22  3:42 ` [PATCH 4/6] dax/hmem: Defer Soft Reserved overlap handling until CXL region assembly completes Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01  4:01   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-22  3:42 ` [PATCH 5/6] dax/hmem: Reintroduce Soft Reserved ranges back into the iomem tree Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-04 18:14   ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-10 13:41   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-30  4:03     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2025-08-22  3:42 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] cxl/region, dax/hmem: Guard CXL DAX region creation and tighten HMEM deps Smita Koralahalli
2025-09-01  6:21   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-09-30  4:06     ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita [this message]
2025-08-26 23:21 ` [PATCH 0/6] dax/hmem, cxl: Coordinate Soft Reserved handling with CXL Alison Schofield
2025-08-28 23:34   ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=652a4391-4825-46bf-9f64-52e0ef751dff@amd.com \
    --to=skoralah@amd.com \
    --cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    --cc=nathan.fontenot@amd.com \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pavel@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rrichter@amd.com \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox