public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] PM: runtime: Fixes related to device links management
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:10:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6543936.FbWAdBN1tG@kreacher> (raw)

Hi Greg & all,

Commit d12544fb2aa9 ("PM: runtime: Remove link state checks in
rpm_get/put_supplier()") merged recently introduced a weakness
in the handling of device links in the runtime PM framework that
may be confusing and even harmful.

Namely, the checks removed by that commit prevented PM-runtime from
getting or dropping references to the supplier device whose driver
was going away via its links to consumers, which specifically allowed
the pm_runtime_clean_up_links() called from __device_release_driver()
to run without interfering with runtime suspend/resume of consumer
devices (which still might happen even though the drivers had been
unbound from them by that time).

After the above commit, calling pm_runtime_clean_up_links() from
__device_release_driver() makes a little sense and it may be interfering
destructively with regular PM-runtime suspend/resume control flows, so
it needs to be either fixed or dropped altogether.  I prefer the latter,
because among other things this removes an arbitrary difference in the
handling of managed device links with respect to the stateless ones,
so patch [2/3] is doing just that.

However, in some rare cases pm_runtime_clean_up_links() may help to clean
up leftover PM-runtime references, so if that function goes away, they
need to be cleaned up elsewhere.  That's why patch [1/3] modifies
__device_link_del() to drop them upon device link removal (which also
needs to be done for stateless device links and that's why I'm regarding
this patch as a fix).

Finally, to avoid pointless overhead related to suspending and resuming
the target device for multiple times in a row in __device_release_driver(),
it is better to resume it upfront before checking its links to consumers,
which is done by patch [3/3].

While this series touches the driver core, it really is mostly related to
runtime PM, so I can apply it if that's OK.

Thanks!




             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-21 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-21 19:10 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2020-10-21 19:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] PM: runtime: Drop runtime PM references to supplier on link removal Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-21 19:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] PM: runtime: Drop pm_runtime_clean_up_links() Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-21 19:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] PM: runtime: Resume the device earlier in __device_release_driver() Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-22 13:40   ` chenxiang (M)
2020-10-22 14:16     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-22 15:38   ` [PATCH update " Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found] ` <7ebacb82-dc0c-3938-660d-52810607ac00@hisilicon.com>
2020-10-23 15:06   ` [PATCH 0/3] PM: runtime: Fixes related to device links management Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-10-30 16:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-01  9:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6543936.FbWAdBN1tG@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox