From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Vincent Mailhol' <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>,
'Martin Uecker' <muecker@gwdg.de>
Cc: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
'Luc Van Oostenryck' <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
'Nathan Chancellor' <nathan@kernel.org>,
"'Nick Desaulniers'" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
'Bill Wendling' <morbo@google.com>,
'Justin Stitt' <justinstitt@google.com>,
'Yury Norov' <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
'Rasmus Villemoes' <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
'Kees Cook' <kees@kernel.org>,
"'Gustavo A. R. Silva'" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
'Jani Nikula' <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
'Joonas Lahtinen' <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
'Rodrigo Vivi' <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
'Tvrtko Ursulin' <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
'David Airlie' <airlied@gmail.com>,
'Simona Vetter' <simona@ffwll.ch>,
'Suzuki K Poulose' <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
'Mike Leach' <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
'James Clark' <james.clark@linaro.org>,
'Alexander Shishkin' <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
'Rikard Falkeborn' <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>,
"'linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'llvm@lists.linux.dev'" <llvm@lists.linux.dev>,
"'linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org'"
<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>,
"'intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org'"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"'dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org'"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"'coresight@lists.linaro.org'" <coresight@lists.linaro.org>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 02/10] compiler.h: add is_const() as a replacement of __is_constexpr()
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:34:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6576cf10fc424eab874a31714e60474b@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ef03cebb4dd406885d8fdf79aaef043@AcuMS.aculab.com>
From: David Laight
> Sent: 06 December 2024 02:26
(now it is no longer 2am...)
Linus suggested this a while back:
> in https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wiq=GUNWJwWh1CRAYchW73UmOaSkaCovLatfDKeveZctA@mail.gmail.com/
>
> /*
> * iff 'x' is a non-zero constant integer expression,
> * then '!(x)' will be a zero constant integer expression,
> * and casting that to 'void *' will result in a NULL pointer.
> * Otherwise casting it to 'void *' will be just a regular 'void *'.
> *
> * The type of '0 ? NULL : (char *)' is 'char *'
> * The type of '0 ? (void *) : (char *) is 'void *'
> */
> #define const_true(x) \
> _Generic(0 ? (void *)((long)!(x)) : (char *)0, char *: 1, void *: 0)
But some of the things built on it has issues with compiler warnings.
I think there have several variations before and since with subtle differences.
Probably const_zero() const_true() const_false() and const_expr().
While the 'base' define is really const_zero() with just (long)(x) that
will mask high bits off 'long long'.
A const_false() could 'fix' that using (long)!!(x) but even !(x) starts
giving compile errors.
If called for pointers (long)((x) == 0) is also problematic.
(Perhaps this is less likely now that min/max don't use it.)
So we may end up with (long)((x) ? 0 : 1) which really might as
well be written ((x) ? 0L : 1L).
The use is likely to be const_true(x > y) so perhaps there isn't a
reason to have const_false() since the boolean operator can be inverted.
const_expr() has relied on '* 0' to make all constant expressions zero.
But it has to handle pointers - so needs a conditional.
Since it is only one line, maybe just replicate the whole thing as:
#define const_true(x) _Generic(0 ? (void *)((x) ? 0L : 1L) : (char *)0, char *: 1, void *: 0)
#define const_expr(x) _Generic(0 ? (void *)((x) ? 0L : 0L) : (char *)0, char *: 1, void *: 0)
Or maybe (mostly because the lines are shorter):
#define const_NULL(x) _Generic(0 ? (x) : (char *)0, char *: 1, void *: 0)
#define const_true(x) const_NULL((void *)(x) ? 0L : 1L))
#define const_expr(x) const_NULL((void *)(x) ? 0L : 0L))
Or even:
#define const_true(x) const_NULL((x) ? NULL : (void *)1L))
#define const_expr(x) const_NULL((x) ? NULL : NULL))
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-06 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-02 17:33 [PATCH 00/10] compiler.h: refactor __is_constexpr() into is_const{,_true,_false}() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2024-12-02 17:33 ` [PATCH 01/10] compiler.h: add statically_false() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2024-12-04 18:30 ` David Laight
2024-12-05 15:25 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-06 3:39 ` David Laight
2024-12-06 4:42 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-02 17:33 ` [PATCH 02/10] compiler.h: add is_const() as a replacement of __is_constexpr() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2024-12-04 18:39 ` David Laight
2024-12-04 21:20 ` Yury Norov
2024-12-05 15:31 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-06 2:25 ` David Laight
2024-12-06 6:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-06 7:19 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-06 8:49 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-06 8:29 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-06 18:30 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-06 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-06 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-06 19:06 ` David Laight
2024-12-06 19:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-06 19:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-12-06 19:43 ` David Laight
2024-12-06 19:38 ` David Laight
2024-12-06 20:23 ` David Laight
2024-12-07 7:42 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-07 11:19 ` David Laight
2024-12-07 12:24 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-07 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-07 19:51 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-07 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-07 20:54 ` David Laight
2024-12-07 21:00 ` David Laight
2024-12-07 21:06 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-07 21:45 ` David Laight
2024-12-09 9:59 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2024-12-06 6:40 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-06 7:26 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-07 8:39 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-07 10:33 ` David Laight
2024-12-07 13:07 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-07 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-07 19:19 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-07 20:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-07 23:52 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-08 1:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-08 9:18 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-08 11:26 ` David Laight
2024-12-08 12:38 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-08 16:48 ` David Laight
2024-12-08 18:10 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-08 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-07 12:45 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-07 13:18 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-07 13:50 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-07 14:59 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-07 15:10 ` Martin Uecker
2024-12-07 15:23 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-07 18:07 ` David Laight
2024-12-06 9:34 ` David Laight [this message]
2024-12-02 17:33 ` [PATCH 03/10] compiler.h: add is_const_true() and is_const_false() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2024-12-04 18:48 ` David Laight
2024-12-05 15:48 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-02 17:33 ` [PATCH 04/10] linux/bits.h: simplify GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK() by using is_const_true() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2024-12-04 18:52 ` David Laight
2024-12-05 15:49 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-02 17:33 ` [PATCH 05/10] minmax: simplify __clamp_once() by using is_const_false() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2024-12-04 18:54 ` David Laight
2024-12-05 15:52 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-09 12:32 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-02 17:33 ` [PATCH 06/10] fortify: replace __is_constexpr() by is_const() in strlen() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2024-12-04 18:58 ` David Laight
2024-12-05 15:53 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-02 17:33 ` [PATCH 07/10] overflow: replace __is_constexpr() by is_const() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2024-12-02 17:33 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/reg: replace __is_const_expr() by is_const_true() or is_const() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2024-12-04 19:00 ` David Laight
2024-12-05 15:56 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-12-02 17:33 ` [PATCH 09/10] coresight: etm4x: replace __is_const_expr() by is_const() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2024-12-02 17:33 ` [PATCH 10/10] compiler.h: remove __is_constexpr() Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
2024-12-04 23:58 ` [PATCH 00/10] compiler.h: refactor __is_constexpr() into is_const{,_true,_false}() Kees Cook
2024-12-05 15:21 ` Vincent Mailhol
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6576cf10fc424eab874a31714e60474b@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=muecker@gwdg.de \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox