From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com (mail-wm1-f49.google.com [209.85.128.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF8FC2E844; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 22:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="E0+/SbTl" Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40d4f5d902dso136825e9.2; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 14:10:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1703283054; x=1703887854; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:subject:cc :to:from:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gCLvoz9oWI8Usfn961/vLhk6ER6XyjpcObYFpVk00EE=; b=E0+/SbTl296q0+R4Pf+VjNxSFbPld4GuphzR5TelKJApdhZUFRp96FNXSC2qWoLb/G 6RbJRJnPPyvbo7NvYR3ViaXiMq9HhprseLdpEjmw9bl+0ilkO4laHJ51Imm5EMUMeKxA ecgaI9JNJEoNKM5wffX/BKDCrlDMb8uEkYKJ3/pQt+ha40a/wbhoiOICTQt6BgHiT4ZX kbeSc+Mmz2B460WdWj+F8d3yYl0p0LsTskvHc/VuSTB+F2IJJLb4Kf5xvLCqTv4jAkSe 9OyqDQUO2arxI0lakJ9HvlT/aBcnO/KOWlFzrxJAJF+5D3flazauYLoXAefZ0ZJ5hoIM 4ydQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703283054; x=1703887854; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:subject:cc :to:from:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=gCLvoz9oWI8Usfn961/vLhk6ER6XyjpcObYFpVk00EE=; b=GbDrA+kkC+yM2FfPbM8SuqsNfFO4WMF/wRbXa6p9Ri4hj3kZMbmh9+Qouu4mcreU56 PJZf9UtMqe/OWjs1Byzgh/8S4mgduwBepYCshvSAhOIGDxKdAatWdCxiXhpNPWTjmAW9 bVVFZ6vpUEOTXDk9TKcLIIpRHy6zcbwUVXZIXW2A9YMIT4yoFnAB3XOtFzgVc1qabDCI UUqYEgrVwlap7Hf2mkXlqVF764Q9fS2w3t4EdBwHVxYHHNmXlCjwMlJ1ZBaZGejA7lkI AQmGZW1lq91v1xE4VtKMnqb/RdHnghpiaINJukDCQN5/oqk5p7kJkA6K4AVdochpyVI6 ALRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YySqoZ7W3qBfbM9PcHLZROVzS0IB9LcjCZpvGm/5UkXoCkEsQ7p mYsRTc9rkMlcP5gUUKDnmy0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IElAO3C56YOO2pWG1e68GcncYDxk7cc4Fb8aiDDgzJhIuHcUgD4w5UdQzlhe1VddXOuVN8uyg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3ba9:b0:40c:f7d:27b2 with SMTP id n41-20020a05600c3ba900b0040c0f7d27b2mr1189958wms.2.1703283053985; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 14:10:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from Ansuel-xps. (host-95-250-248-68.retail.telecomitalia.it. [95.250.248.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a15-20020adfed0f000000b00336673a4153sm5157811wro.80.2023.12.22.14.10.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Dec 2023 14:10:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6586096d.df0a0220.1a02f.6ace@mx.google.com> X-Google-Original-Message-ID: Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 23:09:21 +0100 From: Christian Marangi To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Rob Herring , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Florian Fainelli , netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tobias Waldekranz Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: net: phy: Document new LEDs polarity property References: <20231215212244.1658-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <20231215212244.1658-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <20231220152209.GA229412-robh@kernel.org> <42ddbe25-8acd-4959-ae84-269e943f7c84@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42ddbe25-8acd-4959-ae84-269e943f7c84@lunn.ch> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:34:41AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > I do worry this continues to evolve until we've re-created the pinctrl > > binding... > > Hi Rob > > What is you opinion of the pinctrl binding? Should we just copy parts > of it? > Hi, I have the new series ready but I'm not sure pincfg-node have useful property. What we should use from there? From what I can see only output-low would be useful to us. I didn't find a way to handle the inactive mode. Should I send the new series so we can continue the discussion there or better to wait for Rob feedback? -- Ansuel