From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753416AbbCDWay (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 17:30:54 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:57514 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752662AbbCDWax (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2015 17:30:53 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Mark Rutland , Boris Brezillon , Jason Cooper , Linux PM list , Peter Zijlstra , Nicolas Ferre , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 23:27:37 +0100 Message-ID: <6591581.ooCMyGoxxx@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20150304221729.GI3989@piout.net> References: <1424771762-16343-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150304200040.GA12126@leverpostej> <20150304221729.GI3989@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:QT30/Xrf+orcuJRPbat6Wb5mRlX8QHHlbvsYNm7UtUKJxe3EQHX lx9cidO1Aps/ClD3xsV2/6zG5TxTkxfCo6wxZR//R6cdjl3Uk9kCWvk2ZRs96CK/90UvCOX fAMeJnCzS0Ayl4q/t0wirfeFYJt2EK0C2QtKLVjgjnNRFdI1IOyOnk+agHEIqpB+NVhovFv oL1rb7VbMwmZyzWwnrULw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 04 March 2015 23:17:29 Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote : > > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share > > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by > ^ an > > > > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an > > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver > > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling > > And genuine question, should we use British English or American English > or we don't care ? I believe most developers use Incorrect English, the second most common is American English, followed by Indian English and British English. ;-) More seriously, just try to be consistent within one file or subsystem. Arnd