From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
"ziwei.dai" <ziwei.dai@unisoc.com>,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched/psi: Avoid losing wakeups during rtpoll worker replacement
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 17:51:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65ca1d4e-b11b-4d4c-9562-ef3e0a12c6db@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpGG+VLcNGkL6aeazdnTQ+zcb_WPTzqkDd5npxBf8GQboA@mail.gmail.com>
在 2026/7/27 12:03, Suren Baghdasaryan 写道:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 2:14 AM Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> From: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> psi_trigger_destroy() clears rtpoll_task while holding the trigger
>> lock, but has to drop the lock before stopping the worker because
>> psi_rtpoll_work() takes the same lock. A new trigger can therefore
>> install a replacement worker before the old one exits.
>>
>> rtpoll_wakeup is shared by both workers. The wait condition currently
>
> To be clear, "both workers" refer to the old worked being stopped and
> the new worked created by psi_trigger_create(). Please spell that out
> to avoid confusion.
>
Hi Suren,
Sorry for the late reply, I got tied up with some other work :)
Thanks for the review. Yes, I'll make that explicit in v2.
>> consumes it before checking whether the worker should stop. If the
>> replacement timer sets the wakeup while the old worker is being stopped,
>> the old worker can consume it and then exit. Since the one-shot timer has
>> already fired and rtpoll_scheduled remains set, the replacement can stay
>> asleep and rtpolling can stall.
>>
>> Make the wait condition only observe the wakeup. Check for stop before
>> consuming it and, once consumed, always process the work.
>>
>> Fixes: 461daba06bdc ("psi: eliminate kthread_worker from psi trigger scheduling mechanism")
>> Signed-off-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/psi.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c
>> index 4e152410653d..b9e2a93a757b 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
>> @@ -743,10 +743,16 @@ static int psi_rtpoll_worker(void *data)
>>
>> while (true) {
>> wait_event_interruptible(group->rtpoll_wait,
>> - atomic_cmpxchg(&group->rtpoll_wakeup, 1, 0) ||
>> + atomic_read(&group->rtpoll_wakeup) ||
>> kthread_should_stop());
>> if (kthread_should_stop())
>> break;
>> + /*
>> + * Consume the wakeup only after checking for stop. Once consumed,
>> + * always run the work so a replacement worker cannot lose it.
>> + */
>> + if (atomic_cmpxchg(&group->rtpoll_wakeup, 1, 0) != 1)
>> + continue;
>
> This works but a simpler fix is to reorder conditions in
> wait_event_interruptible() call like this:
>
> while (true) {
> wait_event_interruptible(group->rtpoll_wait,
> kthread_should_stop() ||
> atomic_cmpxchg(&group->rtpoll_wakeup, 1, 0));
> if (kthread_should_stop())
> break;
>
> psi_rtpoll_work(group);
> }
>
> The old worker would check kthread_should_stop() and stop before it
> can consume rtpoll_wakeup. Do you agree?
>
Could the following race still happen?
old worker teardown
-------------------------------------------------------
kthread_should_stop() == false
cmpxchg(wakeup, 1, 0) succeeds
kthread_stop() sets SHOULD_STOP
kthread_should_stop() == true
exits without running the work
In this case, it seems the old worker could still consume the wakeup and
then observe the stop request before calling psi_rtpoll_work().
Therefore, reordering the conditions appears to narrow the race window,
but does not close it completely.
Thanks,
Guopeng
>>
>> psi_rtpoll_work(group);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 9:14 [PATCH 0/3] sched/psi: Fix rtpoll teardown races Guopeng Zhang
2026-07-17 9:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/psi: Avoid losing wakeups during rtpoll worker replacement Guopeng Zhang
2026-07-27 4:03 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-08-07 9:51 ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
2026-07-17 9:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/psi: Prevent stale timer rearm after rtpoll teardown Guopeng Zhang
2026-07-27 4:49 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-08-07 9:52 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-07-17 9:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched/psi: Avoid clobbering rtpoll_scheduled during teardown Guopeng Zhang
2026-07-27 5:53 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65ca1d4e-b11b-4d4c-9562-ef3e0a12c6db@linux.dev \
--to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
--cc=ziwei.dai@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox