From: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@linux.dev>
To: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zheng Gu <cengku@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] dm-pcache: fix metadata indexing and persistence issues
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 13:56:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65dbab10-a48a-4cfb-8c06-15011e54b1b5@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251202121158.111092-1-me@linux.beauty>
Hi,
Thanx for your patches, there are some comments inline.
According to these comments, I propose an update base on your patch as [1].
BTW, I added a test case for this problem in dtg-tests:
https://github.com/DataTravelGuide/dtg-tests/blob/main/pcache.py.data/pcache_misc_tests/case21_gc_percent_persistence_after_recreate.sh
It update gc_percent online and recreate pcache device and check gc_percen
[1]:
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c
index 6d5001548628..4d6db733c9bd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c
@@ -42,12 +42,7 @@ static int cache_info_init(struct pcache_cache
*cache, struct pcache_cache_optio
if (IS_ERR(cache_info_addr))
return PTR_ERR(cache_info_addr);
- if (cache_info_addr) {
- int index = ((char *)cache_info_addr - (char
*)cache->cache_info_addr) /
- PCACHE_CACHE_INFO_SIZE;
-
- cache->info_index = (index + 1) % PCACHE_META_INDEX_MAX;
-
+ if (cache_info_addr) {
if (opts->data_crc !=
(cache->cache_info.flags &
PCACHE_CACHE_FLAGS_DATA_CRC)) {
pcache_dev_err(pcache, "invalid option for
data_crc: %s, expected: %s",
@@ -56,6 +51,8 @@ static int cache_info_init(struct pcache_cache *cache,
struct pcache_cache_optio
return -EINVAL;
}
+ cache->info_index = ((char *)cache_info_addr - (char
*)cache->cache_info_addr) / PCACHE_CACHE_INFO_SIZE;
+
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache_segment.c
b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache_segment.c
index 0b4bb08011ce..0a0016702ce7 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache_segment.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache_segment.c
@@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ static int cache_seg_info_load(struct
pcache_cache_segment *cache_seg)
cache_seg->info_index =
((char *)cache_seg_info_addr - (char
*)cache_seg_info_addr_base) /
PCACHE_SEG_INFO_SIZE;
- cache_seg->info_index = (cache_seg->info_index + 1) %
PCACHE_META_INDEX_MAX;
out:
mutex_unlock(&cache_seg->info_lock);
在 12/2/2025 8:11 PM, Li Chen 写道:
> From: Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
>
> dm-pcache stores metadata (cache_info and segment_info) in 4K-aligned
> slots on the cache device, using sequence numbers and CRC to identify
> the latest valid copy.
>
> However, the cache_info and segment_info paths were computing their
> on-media index using sizeof(struct) instead of the 4K metadata stride.
> As a result:
>
> * cache_info updates (including gc_percent set via a dmsetup message)
> were written to invalid offsets between metadata slots and failed
> to persist across table reloads or reboots.
>
> * segment_info indexing became desynchronized, so rotation to the
> "next" slot no longer matched the location returned by
> pcache_meta_find_latest().
>
> The issue can be reproduced with:
>
> dmsetup create pcache_vdb --table \
> "0 $(blockdev --getsz /dev/vdb) pcache /dev/pmem0 /dev/vdb 4 \
> cache_mode writeback data_crc false"
>
> # Check default gc_percent (70)
> dmsetup status pcache_vdb
>
> # Change gc_percent to 10
> dmsetup message pcache_vdb 0 "gc_percent 10"
>
> # Verify change is active in memory
> dmsetup status pcache_vdb
>
> # Reboot the system...
>
> # Without patch (gc_percent reverts to 70):
> dmsetup status pcache_vdb
>
> # With patch (gc_percent persists as 10):
> dmsetup status pcache_vdb
>
> This series fixes the issue by deriving the metadata slot index from
> the pointer returned by pcache_meta_find_latest(), using the 4K stride
> (CACHE_INFO_SIZE / SEG_INFO_SIZE). This ensures that updates to
> cache_info and segment_info are written to valid slots and remain
> consistent with the on-media layout.
>
> Li Chen (2):
> dm pcache: fix cache info indexing
> dm pcache: fix segment info indexing
>
> drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> drivers/md/dm-pcache/cache_segment.c | 6 +++++-
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-03 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-02 12:11 [PATCH 0/2] dm-pcache: fix metadata indexing and persistence issues Li Chen
2025-12-02 12:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] dm pcache: fix cache info indexing Li Chen
2025-12-03 5:56 ` Dongsheng Yang
2025-12-03 23:38 ` Dongsheng Yang
2025-12-02 12:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] dm pcache: fix segment " Li Chen
2025-12-03 5:57 ` Dongsheng Yang
2025-12-03 23:38 ` Dongsheng Yang
2025-12-02 19:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] dm-pcache: fix metadata indexing and persistence issues Mikulas Patocka
2025-12-03 5:56 ` Dongsheng Yang [this message]
2025-12-03 23:38 ` Dongsheng Yang
2025-12-04 1:38 ` Dongsheng Yang
2025-12-05 9:12 ` Li Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65dbab10-a48a-4cfb-8c06-15011e54b1b5@linux.dev \
--to=dongsheng.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=cengku@gmail.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@linux.beauty \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox