public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Aubrey <aubreylee@gmail.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidm@snapgear.com,
	gerg@snapgear.com
Subject: Re: kernel BUGs when removing largish files with the SLOB allocator
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:02:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6626.1158094964@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060912202826.GC19707@waste.org>

Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:

> Not sure yet. There's only one user in nommu.c that shouldn't just be
> changed to ksize() that I can see, and that's the one in
> show_process_blocks(). That could test for VM_MAPPED_COPY and keep its
> hands off otherwise. 

Hmmm...  You're right.  However, note binfmt_elf_fdpic().  This calls ksize()
but should really call kobjsize().  It should not assume that the allocation
it's been given is of any particular type.  IIRC ksize() changed purpose at
some point.

> I can imagine situations where ->mmap returns pointers to something
> that's statically allocated anyway (XIP?), where kobjsize doesn't
> really make sense.

ramfs for example.  See get_unmapped_area() hooks, not mmap() hooks.

> Also, looks like the WARN_ON_SLACK code has rotten, result isn't
> defined in that function. Change it to base, perhaps?

Yeah.  It might be worth ditching it entirely too.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-12 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-04  6:56 kernel BUGs when removing largish files with the SLOB allocator Aubrey
2006-09-04 10:21 ` David Howells
2006-09-05  3:52   ` Aubrey
2006-09-05  9:35     ` David Howells
2006-09-06  2:35       ` Aubrey
2006-09-06  3:36         ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-12  8:07           ` Aubrey
2006-09-12  8:54             ` David Howells
2006-09-12 10:53               ` Aubrey
2006-09-12 17:43             ` Matt Mackall
2006-09-12 19:10               ` David Howells
2006-09-12 20:51                 ` Matt Mackall
2006-09-12 20:56                   ` David Howells
2006-09-12 21:04                     ` Matt Mackall
2006-09-12 21:59                       ` David Howells
2006-09-13 19:39                         ` Matt Mackall
2006-09-13  2:16                 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-13  7:21                   ` Aubrey
2006-09-12 19:25               ` David Howells
2006-09-12 20:28                 ` Matt Mackall
2006-09-12 21:02                   ` David Howells [this message]
2006-09-12 21:15                     ` Matt Mackall
2006-09-12 20:49                 ` Matt Mackall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6626.1158094964@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=aubreylee@gmail.com \
    --cc=davidm@snapgear.com \
    --cc=gerg@snapgear.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox