From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2691715A499; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 08:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706775986; cv=none; b=rJ8fChhKrZO2DgQnu7sg8Jw4qmOpIN8D1nE0LoZbd6YPS9I/8kzXaUTqC7wO51ICRLkGAO2Wv0TUQcUTNkjxxdm0yCXu4Xdoys9/NdseSHipOZkorx8Vi1K5NXaQhhP9wEvrusXmByen82SROYHiOPj1vAXNWqMp9+Jv276nE6k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706775986; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XpKiZdYw73rtXNsgKWeaOkuxm+QdTdp3TunoJ61mePs=; h=From:Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uCOhOKCiXIOEd513i64cUbhJgXKqCxzY18HwtIGzv2I2kf/lX7sM88VKM8dbWnpvrkoT5/A3rbqbNOhCBq4C5Y9yZoZvh+gMVu5VuYkMgXrdObBfsSUvxrMkRM9XHDAc+RFhWbHR+JX0NnJbModFZL/ZgWgUGRc33CE0us/Wazg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=nsjYj7+v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nsjYj7+v" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1706775985; x=1738311985; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=XpKiZdYw73rtXNsgKWeaOkuxm+QdTdp3TunoJ61mePs=; b=nsjYj7+vsXyNJcehqFZzk08MXS7kXSCleunOBfXkpmJ9wErSDCIGenE7 BunOkfqhDqDoGzlnQ/Qqetp1nkORdxEQV754aJksuhIJc32dk9wCEUoOk 0OUR96VaVCaSEfYDyAOUTKrxWQdyK2MfFVt7mF6YVmi0nzXL3bGbKSzMZ XIc5sYRzQFYZ3ZD57mSe0XnP40xHKxicZoln9bvrlRmz61bfWelIYgRsO RxSAiNbw/Gkb8qLYkPP7VH4MyBnPSdTaNojZksxWPQelb2tXusd7SYL2o ljq/dy3WJUkj7tBzZaU8NYGJRFzZMnG9RecVNydbHtradBtKDbodZ85AC Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10969"; a="22232" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,234,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="22232" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2024 00:26:03 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,234,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="24057" Received: from lutzwalt-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.246.33.1]) by orviesa006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2024 00:25:58 -0800 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:25:53 +0200 (EET) To: Maximilian Luz cc: Guenter Roeck , Ivor Wanders , Hans de Goede , Jean Delvare , Jonathan Corbet , Mark Gross , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] platform/surface: aggregator_registry: add entry for fan speed In-Reply-To: <8552a795-9ce4-417a-bc71-593571a6b363@gmail.com> Message-ID: <6659d49c-4a70-1a92-2a76-ce7144fed50c@linux.intel.com> References: <20240131005856.10180-1-ivor@iwanders.net> <20240131005856.10180-3-ivor@iwanders.net> <7e392c1e-2cb2-43e4-804e-227551ed2dd7@roeck-us.net> <8552a795-9ce4-417a-bc71-593571a6b363@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, Maximilian Luz wrote: > Am 1/31/2024 um 2:24 PM schrieb Guenter Roeck: > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:58:56PM -0500, Ivor Wanders wrote: > > > Add an entry for the fan speed function. > > > Add this new entry to the Surface Pro 9 group. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ivor Wanders > > > Link: https://github.com/linux-surface/kernel/pull/144 > > > Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz > > > > I wasn't sure if the Reviewed-by: tag means that I should apply the patch > > through the hwmon subsystem. If so, please let me know. For now I'll > > assume that it will be applied through a platform tree. > > I think it would make more sense for it to go through pdx86 (as usual > for platform/surface). That would avoid any potential merge conflicts > if we get more changes to the surface_aggregator_registry later on. > > Hans, Ilpo, could you please take this? > > Also I just noticed that Ilpo wasn't CCd, I assume because of an older > MAINTAINERS list. Ivor, please add him for any next submissions to > platform/surface. Okay, thanks for letting me know (I assumed the opposite). I'll take it through pdx86. -- i.