Re: [PATCH v2] x86/fpu: Avoid writing LBR bit to IA32_XSS unless supported

[Mitchell Levy <levymitchell0@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 01:08:18AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09 2024 at 13:53, Mitchell Levy via wrote:
> > From: Mitchell Levy <levymitchell0@gmail.com>
> 
> ...
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Mitchell Levy <levymitchell0@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Corrected Fixes tag (thanks tglx)
> > - Properly check for XSAVES support of LBR (thanks tglx)
> 
> IOW. I provided you the proper fix and now you are reposting it and
> claiming authorship for it?
Apologies, I did not consider authorship implications when resubmitting,
as I haven't encountered the situation where a patch is essentially
rewritten during the review process before. I will be much more mindful
of issues of authorship in future, and I appreciate you pointing this
out to me.

> May I ask you to read Documentation/process/ ?
Yes, I have now more thoroughly covered these docs. On second look, it
appears there's no Signed-off-by in your reply to my v1. I can send the
patch with you properly listed as the author and the proper
Signed-off-by lines if I have your permission to add your signoff.
Alternatively, feel free to reuse part/all of my commit message if you'd
rather submit the patch directly; it's quite understandable if you feel
unenthusiastic about me being involved with code you've authored.

> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx