public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Enable L0s/L1 for removable devices when BIOS didn't configure ASPM
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 11:08:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66ceb34e-17a0-4ff5-8534-9067d4e9b32c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505160525.GA733339@bhelgaas>



On 5/5/26 11:05, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 05:52:46PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> When comparing lspci output between Windows and Linux for hotplugged
>> Thunderbolt 5 eGPU devices, Windows enables ASPM L1 but Linux doesn't:
>>
>>    Windows: LnkCtl: ASPM L1 Enabled
>>    Linux:   LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled
>>
>> This difference in ASPM configuration can cause behavioral differences
>> between the two operating systems for the same hardware.
> 
> A tangent, not a comment on the patch itself, but what sort of
> behavioral differences are these?  If ASPM is working correctly, the
> only differences *should* be in power consumption and performance.

This originally stemmed from a significant performance difference that 
was observed between Windows and Linux with eGPUs.  The link in the 
patch points at that bug if you want to look more closely at it.

I was hopeful that aligning ASPM would align the behavior, but alas this 
didn't.

It was still a difference that I figured we should discuss whether it 
should be changed to be consistent.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-05 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-04 22:52 [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Enable L0s/L1 for removable devices when BIOS didn't configure ASPM Mario Limonciello
2026-05-05 16:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-05-05 16:08   ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2026-05-05 21:42     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-05-06  3:36       ` Mario Limonciello
2026-05-05 18:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-06  4:53   ` Mika Westerberg
2026-05-06 15:10     ` Mario Limonciello
2026-05-06 15:27       ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66ceb34e-17a0-4ff5-8534-9067d4e9b32c@amd.com \
    --to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox