From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-serial <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] serial: 8250_dw: Take port lock while accessing LSR
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:29:41 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66df725d-be75-a0df-2118-a99c71be6c41@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqmvTrV3o9CfgBbx@smile.fi.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1211 bytes --]
On Wed, 15 Jun 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 12:06:50PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > Accessing LSR requires port lock because it mutates lsr_saved_flags
> > in serial_lsr_in().
>
> I got this as patch 2/3, where are the 1/3 and 3/3?
That's probably because get_maintainer.pl didn't pick you up for the other
patches and I didn't explicitly send them to you. Here they are:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/20220615090651.15340-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com/T/#t
> > @@ -266,7 +266,10 @@ static int dw8250_handle_irq(struct uart_port *p)
> >
> > /* Manually stop the Rx DMA transfer when acting as flow controller */
> > if (quirks & DW_UART_QUIRK_IS_DMA_FC && up->dma && up->dma->rx_running && rx_timeout) {
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&p->lock, flags);
> > status = serial_lsr_in(up);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->lock, flags);
>
> This reminds me the question, why do we need to save flags here? Aren't we in
> IRQ context already? (Perhaps another patch might be issued.)
Currently serial8250_handle_irq() reads from LSR again. I guess it would
be possible to read LSR only once and pass it as a parameter. It would
require some rework though.
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220615090651.15340-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
2022-06-15 9:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] serial: 8250: Fix __stop_tx() & DMA Tx restart races Ilpo Järvinen
2022-06-15 9:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] serial: 8250_dw: Take port lock while accessing LSR Ilpo Järvinen
2022-06-15 10:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-15 10:29 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2022-06-27 12:49 ` Greg KH
2022-06-15 9:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] serial: 8250_dma: No need for if (dma->tx_err) Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66df725d-be75-a0df-2118-a99c71be6c41@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox