public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: frederic@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 0/3] RCU CPU stall-warning changes for v6.13
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 20:01:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <670f0257.d40a0220.9c8db.5c21@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5a833c4-6346-4ec4-8360-4a818342fb52@paulmck-laptop>

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 04:02:37PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 02:49:06PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 11:05:02AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > > 
> > > This series contains RCU CPU stall-warning changes for v6.13:
> > > 
> > > 1.	Delete unused rcu_gp_might_be_stalled() function.
> > > 
> > > 2.	Stop stall warning from dumping stacks if grace period ends.
> > > 
> > > 3.	Finer-grained grace-period-end checks in rcu_dump_cpu_stacks().
> > > 
> > 
> > Other than small nit in 2/3, 
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> 
> Applied, thank you, and I also added the data_race() in 2/3.
> 
> > I was curious if you're seeing perf or other improvements with the
> > finer-grained rnp locking.
> 
> This is about robustness rather that performance, though I suppose you
> could argue that lack of robustness is an extreme form of bad performance.
> Holding the leaf rcu_node locks for too long while dumping stacks can
> result in things like CSD-lock timeouts due to the dumping CPU having
> interrupts disabled for an extended period.
> 
> And earlier commit, 1ecd9d68eb44 ("rcu: Defer printing stall-warning
> backtrace when holding rcu_node lock"), took care of most of the issue
> by deferring the actual output.  But while in the area, it seemed wise
> to avoid up to 64 dumps being generated (but no longer printed) while
> holding a leaf rcu_node lock.
> 
> Hence this commit.

That's smart to do and makes sense, thanks!

 - Joel


> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> > thanks,
> > 
> >  - Joel
> > 
> > 
> > > 						Thanx, Paul
> > > 
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > >  b/include/linux/rcutiny.h |    1 -
> > >  b/include/linux/rcutree.h |    1 -
> > >  b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h |   30 ------------------------------
> > >  kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h   |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > >  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> > > 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-16  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09 18:05 [PATCH rcu 0/3] RCU CPU stall-warning changes for v6.13 Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-09 18:05 ` [PATCH rcu 1/3] rcu: Delete unused rcu_gp_might_be_stalled() function Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-09 18:05 ` [PATCH rcu 2/3] rcu: Stop stall warning from dumping stacks if grace period ends Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-15 18:48   ` Joel Fernandes
2024-10-09 18:05 ` [PATCH rcu 3/3] rcu: Finer-grained grace-period-end checks in rcu_dump_cpu_stacks() Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-15 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 0/3] RCU CPU stall-warning changes for v6.13 Joel Fernandes
2024-10-15 23:02   ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-16  0:01     ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2024-10-16 16:18 ` [PATCH v2 " Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-16 16:19   ` [PATCH v2 rcu 1/3] rcu: Delete unused rcu_gp_might_be_stalled() function Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-16 16:19   ` [PATCH v2 rcu 2/3] rcu: Stop stall warning from dumping stacks if grace period ends Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-16 16:19   ` [PATCH v2 rcu 3/3] rcu: Finer-grained grace-period-end checks in rcu_dump_cpu_stacks() Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-29  0:22     ` [PATCH v3 " Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-29  2:20       ` Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)
2024-10-29 16:29         ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-30  3:55           ` Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)
2024-10-30 13:54             ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-30 20:12               ` Doug Anderson
2024-10-30 23:26                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-31  0:21                   ` Doug Anderson
2024-10-31  5:03                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-31 21:27                       ` Doug Anderson
2024-11-01  1:44                         ` Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)
2024-11-01 13:55                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-10-30  8:30                             ` Tze-nan Wu (吳澤南)
2024-11-01  7:41               ` Cheng-Jui Wang (王正睿)
2024-11-01 13:59                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-10-18 21:49   ` [PATCH v2 rcu 0/3] RCU CPU stall-warning changes for v6.13 Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=670f0257.d40a0220.9c8db.5c21@mx.google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox