From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Danielle Costantino <dcostantino@meta.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] workqueue: Show all busy workers in stall diagnostics
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 07:21:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <671a7905-f6b3-4bd4-bb08-130a5cc340e4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afx1DYxOGzjIP_EV@gmail.com>
Hi,
we currently have several reports of this. On s390, ppc64, and x86_64.
On 07. 05. 26, 15:11, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 12:20:33PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 05. 03. 26, 17:15, Breno Leitao wrote:
>>
>> BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=144 node=0 flags=0x4 nice=0 stuck for
>> 168224s!
>
> That's an extremely long stall (~1.95 days).
>
>> ...
>> Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:
>> workqueue rcu_gp: flags=0x108
>> pwq 578: cpus=144 node=0 flags=0x4 nice=0 active=3 refcnt=4
>> in:
>> https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263947
>> ?
>>
>> Can this (or other patch from the series) cause this? Should there be
>> something like cpu_online() instead of task_is_running() somewhere?
>
> This series only affects stall reporting, not detection. The changes run
> after the watchdog has identified a stall, so the detection logic itself
> remains unchanged.
>
> To help diagnose this issue, could you provide some additional information:
>
> 1) Was CPU 144 online at any point? If so, when was it taken offline?
It was not, it's non-present.
> 2) Does this message appear repeatedly? If you bring CPU 144 online, does
> the issue resolve?
Yes, look at this new x86_64 report's dmesg (I believe it is related to
the above report):
BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=2 node=0 flags=0x4 nice=0 stuck for
50s!
in:
https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=890229
$ grep -c BUG sl.txt
504
$ grep -c pwq sl.txt
509
It comes from:
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264554
> 3) Have you run similar tests on earlier kernel versions without seeing
> this behavior, or is this a clear regression?
It's new in 7.0. Going back to 6.19.12 makes it disappear.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260305-wqstall_start-at-v2-0-b60863ee0899@debian.org>
[not found] ` <20260305-wqstall_start-at-v2-4-b60863ee0899@debian.org>
2026-05-07 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] workqueue: Show all busy workers in stall diagnostics Jiri Slaby
2026-05-07 13:11 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-11 5:21 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=671a7905-f6b3-4bd4-bb08-130a5cc340e4@kernel.org \
--to=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dcostantino@meta.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox