public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+fd05de09d1267725aa95@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: dmantipov@yandex.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [ocfs2?] kernel BUG in ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:35:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <673d9f37.050a0220.3c9d61.015e.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241120081457.R0Qrp%dmantipov@yandex.ru>

Hello,

syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in __submit_bio

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.12.0-syzkaller-01782-gbf9aa14fc523-dirty #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/74 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888000cf9438 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#37){++++}-{0:0}, at: __submit_bio+0x2c6/0x560 block/blk-core.c:629

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8ea3bfe0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6850 [inline]
ffffffff8ea3bfe0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7232

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
       __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3851 [inline]
       fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x130 mm/page_alloc.c:3865
       might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:318 [inline]
       slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4036 [inline]
       slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4114 [inline]
       __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4263 [inline]
       __kmalloc_node_noprof+0xb0/0x440 mm/slub.c:4270
       __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:658
       sbitmap_init_node+0x2d4/0x670 lib/sbitmap.c:132
       scsi_realloc_sdev_budget_map+0x2a7/0x460 drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:246
       scsi_add_lun drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:1106 [inline]
       scsi_probe_and_add_lun+0x3173/0x4bd0 drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:1287
       __scsi_add_device+0x228/0x2f0 drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:1622
       ata_scsi_scan_host+0x236/0x740 drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c:4575
       async_run_entry_fn+0xa8/0x420 kernel/async.c:129
       process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3229 [inline]
       process_scheduled_works+0xa63/0x1850 kernel/workqueue.c:3310
       worker_thread+0x870/0xd30 kernel/workqueue.c:3391
       kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
       ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

-> #0 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#37){++++}-{0:0}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
       __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
       bio_queue_enter block/blk.h:75 [inline]
       blk_mq_submit_bio+0x1536/0x23a0 block/blk-mq.c:3092
       __submit_bio+0x2c6/0x560 block/blk-core.c:629
       __submit_bio_noacct_mq block/blk-core.c:710 [inline]
       submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x4d3/0xe30 block/blk-core.c:739
       swap_writepage_bdev_async mm/page_io.c:449 [inline]
       __swap_writepage+0x5fc/0x1400 mm/page_io.c:472
       swap_writepage+0x85d/0xfa0 mm/page_io.c:288
       pageout mm/vmscan.c:689 [inline]
       shrink_folio_list+0x3c0e/0x8cc0 mm/vmscan.c:1367
       evict_folios+0x549b/0x7b50 mm/vmscan.c:4589
       try_to_shrink_lruvec+0x9ab/0xbb0 mm/vmscan.c:4784
       shrink_one+0x3b9/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4822
       shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4885 [inline]
       lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4963 [inline]
       shrink_node+0x3789/0x3e10 mm/vmscan.c:5943
       kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6771 [inline]
       balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6963 [inline]
       kswapd+0x1ca9/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7232
       kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
       ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(fs_reclaim);
                               lock(&q->q_usage_counter(io)#37);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
  rlock(&q->q_usage_counter(io)#37);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by kswapd0/74:
 #0: ffffffff8ea3bfe0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6850 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8ea3bfe0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xbf1/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7232

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 74 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.12.0-syzkaller-01782-gbf9aa14fc523-dirty #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
 bio_queue_enter block/blk.h:75 [inline]
 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x1536/0x23a0 block/blk-mq.c:3092
 __submit_bio+0x2c6/0x560 block/blk-core.c:629
 __submit_bio_noacct_mq block/blk-core.c:710 [inline]
 submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x4d3/0xe30 block/blk-core.c:739
 swap_writepage_bdev_async mm/page_io.c:449 [inline]
 __swap_writepage+0x5fc/0x1400 mm/page_io.c:472
 swap_writepage+0x85d/0xfa0 mm/page_io.c:288
 pageout mm/vmscan.c:689 [inline]
 shrink_folio_list+0x3c0e/0x8cc0 mm/vmscan.c:1367
 evict_folios+0x549b/0x7b50 mm/vmscan.c:4589
 try_to_shrink_lruvec+0x9ab/0xbb0 mm/vmscan.c:4784
 shrink_one+0x3b9/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4822
 shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4885 [inline]
 lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4963 [inline]
 shrink_node+0x3789/0x3e10 mm/vmscan.c:5943
 kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6771 [inline]
 balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6963 [inline]
 kswapd+0x1ca9/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7232
 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389
 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
 </TASK>


Tested on:

commit:         bf9aa14f Merge tag 'timers-core-2024-11-18' of git://g..
git tree:       https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17184b78580000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=48190c1cdf985419
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=fd05de09d1267725aa95
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
patch:          https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=153646c0580000


       reply	other threads:[~2024-11-20  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20241120081457.R0Qrp%dmantipov@yandex.ru>
2024-11-20  8:35 ` syzbot [this message]
2024-11-01 20:51 [syzbot] [ocfs2?] kernel BUG in ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits syzbot
2024-11-06 23:12 ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=673d9f37.050a0220.3c9d61.015e.GAE@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+fd05de09d1267725aa95@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=dmantipov@yandex.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox