public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: syzbot <syzbot+8df514c431bd240c5644@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  ntfs3@lists.linux.dev,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [ntfs3?] possible deadlock in mark_as_free_ex (2)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:35:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <675aa04e.050a0220.17f54a.0083.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <672dbff0.050a0220.69327.0002.GAE@google.com>

syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    231825b2e1ff Revert "unicode: Don't special case ignorable..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1635ebe8580000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=c7c9f223bfe8924e
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8df514c431bd240c5644
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=128e6cdf980000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1784b20f980000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/dc23b60ff29a/disk-231825b2.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/377c8f65d53a/vmlinux-231825b2.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/09bc1abb7c7a/bzImage-231825b2.xz
mounted in repro #1: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/fe1662038b98/mount_0.gz
mounted in repro #2: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/5c6aa5da5c24/mount_3.gz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+8df514c431bd240c5644@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

ntfs3(loop3): Mark volume as dirty due to NTFS errors
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.13.0-rc2-syzkaller-00036-g231825b2e1ff #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor149/6544 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88807e17a270 (&wnd->rw_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: mark_as_free_ex+0x3e/0x390 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:2484

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880705e43c8 (&ni->file.run_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: ntfs_truncate fs/ntfs3/file.c:505 [inline]
ffff8880705e43c8 (&ni->file.run_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: ntfs_setattr+0x6d3/0xb80 fs/ntfs3/file.c:824

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&ni->file.run_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}:
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
       down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1524
       run_unpack_ex+0x55e/0x9e0 fs/ntfs3/run.c:1119
       ntfs_read_mft fs/ntfs3/inode.c:401 [inline]
       ntfs_iget5+0x1f9a/0x37b0 fs/ntfs3/inode.c:537
       ntfs_dir_emit fs/ntfs3/dir.c:335 [inline]
       ntfs_read_hdr+0x700/0xb80 fs/ntfs3/dir.c:383
       ntfs_readdir+0x91f/0xf00 fs/ntfs3/dir.c:494
       iterate_dir+0x571/0x800 fs/readdir.c:108
       __do_sys_getdents64 fs/readdir.c:403 [inline]
       __se_sys_getdents64+0x1e2/0x4b0 fs/readdir.c:389
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&wnd->rw_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
       __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
       lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
       down_write_nested+0xa2/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1693
       mark_as_free_ex+0x3e/0x390 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:2484
       run_deallocate_ex+0x244/0x5f0 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:122
       attr_set_size+0x168d/0x4300 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:753
       ntfs_truncate fs/ntfs3/file.c:506 [inline]
       ntfs_setattr+0x7a4/0xb80 fs/ntfs3/file.c:824
       notify_change+0xbca/0xe90 fs/attr.c:552
       do_truncate+0x220/0x310 fs/open.c:65
       handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3449 [inline]
       do_open fs/namei.c:3832 [inline]
       path_openat+0x2e1e/0x3590 fs/namei.c:3987
       do_filp_open+0x27f/0x4e0 fs/namei.c:4014
       do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1402
       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1417 [inline]
       __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1425 [inline]
       __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1421 [inline]
       __x64_sys_open+0x225/0x270 fs/open.c:1421
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&ni->file.run_lock#2);
                               lock(&wnd->rw_lock);
                               lock(&ni->file.run_lock#2);
  lock(&wnd->rw_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

4 locks held by syz-executor149/6544:
 #0: ffff888079980420 (sb_writers#11){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:515
 #1: ffff8880705e45b0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#19){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:818 [inline]
 #1: ffff8880705e45b0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#19){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: do_truncate+0x20c/0x310 fs/open.c:63
 #2: ffff8880705e4318 (&ni->ni_lock#2/5){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ni_lock fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h:1110 [inline]
 #2: ffff8880705e4318 (&ni->ni_lock#2/5){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ntfs_truncate fs/ntfs3/file.c:503 [inline]
 #2: ffff8880705e4318 (&ni->ni_lock#2/5){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ntfs_setattr+0x6bf/0xb80 fs/ntfs3/file.c:824
 #3: ffff8880705e43c8 (&ni->file.run_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: ntfs_truncate fs/ntfs3/file.c:505 [inline]
 #3: ffff8880705e43c8 (&ni->file.run_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}, at: ntfs_setattr+0x6d3/0xb80 fs/ntfs3/file.c:824

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6544 Comm: syz-executor149 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-syzkaller-00036-g231825b2e1ff #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/25/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
 down_write_nested+0xa2/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1693
 mark_as_free_ex+0x3e/0x390 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c:2484
 run_deallocate_ex+0x244/0x5f0 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:122
 attr_set_size+0x168d/0x4300 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c:753
 ntfs_truncate fs/ntfs3/file.c:506 [inline]
 ntfs_setattr+0x7a4/0xb80 fs/ntfs3/file.c:824
 notify_change+0xbca/0xe90 fs/attr.c:552
 do_truncate+0x220/0x310 fs/open.c:65
 handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3449 [inline]
 do_open fs/namei.c:3832 [inline]
 path_openat+0x2e1e/0x3590 fs/namei.c:3987
 do_filp_open+0x27f/0x4e0 fs/namei.c:4014
 do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1402
 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1417 [inline]
 __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1425 [inline]
 __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1421 [inline]
 __x64_sys_open+0x225/0x270 fs/open.c:1421
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f17dc4ac879
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 1c 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffc503e84b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f17dc4ac879
RDX: 00000000000001d8 RSI: 0000000000147383 RDI: 0000000020000240
RBP: 00007ffc503e84ec R08: 000000000001f216 R09: 0000000020000880
R10: 00007ffc503e8380 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffc503e8540
R13: 00007ffc503e8500 R14: 0000000000024ec5 R15: 0000000000000090
 </TASK>


---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-12  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-08  7:38 [syzbot] [ntfs3?] possible deadlock in mark_as_free_ex (2) syzbot
2024-11-29  1:43 ` syzbot
2024-12-12  8:35 ` syzbot [this message]
2024-12-13  9:05   ` [PATCH] ntfs3: fix deadlock in mark_as_free_ex Lizhi Xu
2024-12-13  6:43 ` [syzbot] [ntfs3?] possible deadlock in mark_as_free_ex (2) syzbot
2024-12-13  8:24 ` [syzbot] " syzbot
2026-01-17 12:45 ` syzbot
     [not found] <20241213082402.1808426-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
2024-12-13  9:02 ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=675aa04e.050a0220.17f54a.0083.GAE@google.com \
    --to=syzbot+8df514c431bd240c5644@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntfs3@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox