Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] cpufreq: airoha: Add EN7581 CPUFreq SMCCC driver

[Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:35:25PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 09:30:01AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 12-12-24, 13:01, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 at 22:16, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hmm, it looks like this needs to be moved and possibly split up.
> > > 
> > > The provider part (for the clock and power-domain) belongs in
> > > /drivers/pmdomain/*, along with the other power-domain providers.
> > > 
> > > Other than that, I was really expecting the cpufreq-dt to take care of the rest.
> > > 
> > > To me, the above code belongs in a power-domain provider driver. While
> > > the below should be taken care of in cpufreq-dt, except for the device
> > > registration of the cpufreq-dt device, I guess.
> > > 
> > > Viresh, what's your view on this?
> > 
> > Sure, no issues.. These are all cpufreq related, but don't necessarily belong in
> > the cpufreq directory.
> >
> 
> Problem is really DT schema... I wonder if it's acceptable to push a
> name-only driver in pmdomain just do detach from cpufreq. The cpufreq
> driver would manually probe the pmdomain. Is it acceptable?
> 
> Or do you have alternative solution for this?
>

Hi Viresk I notice the DT patch has been applied to -next but no
cpufreq patch. I'm confused how to further proceed and what changes are
needed. Any hint?

-- 
	Ansuel