From: Denis Fedorishenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ip_conntrack problem / perfomance
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:47:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6788034296.20021004104703@nuclearcat.com> (raw)
Dear Mr. linux-net@vger.kernel.org !
I got some problem with conntrack. Very strange problems...
1st - i compile it as module on RedHat kernel 2.4.18-3custom.
I have NAT on this machine, and have users who work on it.
When i start benchmark (polygraph + proxy server) on same host -
perfomance is ~800 req/s.
2nd - i have another, same configuration PC, and have compiled in (not
as module) 2.4.18-10custom and 2.4.20-pre8-ac3 kernel. When it
compiled in - i have at starts ~800 req/s and after 10-20 seconds it
decrease to ~200req/s. If i compile ip_conntrack as module, and not use
ip_conntrack - 1000 req/s. If use as module - decrease to 200 req/s.
I have questions:
1)Is a possible to use any alternative hash for ip_conntrack or like
this?
2)Why conntrack track all requests (for example local) and what way to
drop this tracks, but i still need ip_conntrack to NAT?
3)Any other suggestions?
About hardware:
2xPIII|1.3Ghz / ServerWorks / 2xEtherExpress/100 /1GB RAM
Also in logs, not always, but i see messages like "ip_conntrack: table
full, dropping packet.", but on 2.4.18-custom3 i see this messages
too... but it works 800 req/s :)
Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fedorishenko Denis Olegovich
nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com * Tel: +380 679322793
www.nuclearcat.com * www.planetsky.org * www.itelsat.org
reply other threads:[~2002-10-04 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6788034296.20021004104703@nuclearcat.com \
--to=nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox