public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Brendan Trotter" <btrotter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NMI problems with Dell SMP Xeons
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 21:47:40 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6799.1149680860@ocs3.ocs.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Jun 2006 10:01:40 +0200." <200606071001.40933.ak@suse.de>

Andi Kleen (on Wed, 7 Jun 2006 10:01:40 +0200) wrote:
>
>>
>> Two ways:
>>
>> (1) Boot with a kernel with CONFIG_ACPI=n, so the OS only finds 2 cpus
>>     in the MPT instead of the 4 listed by ACPI.
>>
>> (2) The kernel has ACPI=y, but is booted with maxcpus=2.
>>
>> In both cases, send_IPI_allbutself() with IPI 2 or an NMI will result
>> in a hard reset.
>
>Sounds both like a "Don't do that when it hurts" . I know some people
>have religious issues with ACPI, but it's simple a fact that many
>modern boxes don't work correctly in obvious or subtle ways without it. 

Building a kernel without ACPI is silly nowadays.  But even with ACPI,
booting with a restricted maxcpus and sending IPI 2 or NMI as broadcast
will kill these boxes.  maxcpus is a valid option.


  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-07 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-22  9:08 NMI problems with Dell SMP Xeons Keith Owens
2006-05-22 23:56 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-23  1:26   ` Keith Owens
2006-05-23  1:55     ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-23  2:02       ` Keith Owens
2006-05-23  2:21         ` Keith Owens
2006-05-23  5:03 ` Keith Owens
2006-06-07  4:49   ` Keith Owens
2006-06-07  7:20     ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07  7:43       ` Keith Owens
2006-06-07  8:01         ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07 11:47           ` Keith Owens [this message]
2006-06-07 12:13             ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07 15:18         ` Brendan Trotter
2006-06-07 15:23           ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-07 18:47           ` Rajesh Shah
2006-06-08  0:41             ` Rajesh Shah
2006-06-08  0:46           ` Rajesh Shah
2006-06-08  5:11           ` Keith Owens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6799.1149680860@ocs3.ocs.com.au \
    --to=kaos@sgi.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=btrotter@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox